Regional Sustainability ›› 2024, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (2): 100141.doi: 10.1016/j.regsus.2024.100141cstr: 32279.14.j.regsus.2024.100141

• Full Length Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Assessing the role of forest resources in improving rural livelihoods in West Bengal of India

Soumen BISUIa, Pravat Kumar SHITa,b,*()   

  1. aResearch Center for Natural and Applied Science, Raja Narendra Lal Khan Women’s College (Autonomous), Vidyasagar University, Midnapore, 721102, India
    bPostgraduate Department of Geography, Raja Narendra Lal Khan Women’s College (Autonomous), Vidyasagar University, Midnapore, 721102, India
  • Received:2023-06-20 Revised:2024-03-08 Accepted:2024-06-11 Published:2024-06-30 Online:2024-07-25
  • Contact: Pravat Kumar SHIT E-mail:pravatgeo2007@gmail.com

Abstract:

Forest resources play a vital role in supporting the livelihoods of rural communities residing in forest-rich areas. In India, a forest-rich country, a significant proportion of non-timber forest products (NTFPs) is consumed locally, supporting numerous rural communities relying on forests for essential resources, such as firewood, timber, and NTFPs. This study focuses on two forest-dominant districts in West Bengal of India, namely, Jhargram District and Paschim Medinipur District. Furthermore, this study aims to enhance the understanding of forest-dependent communities by comparing the standard of living among different village classes. Thus, we categorized villages into three classes based on the distance from home to forests, including inner villages, fringe villages, and outer villages. Through focus group discussions and household surveys, we explored the sources of local economy, income sources of household, and reasons for economic diversification in different village classes. The study findings confirm that substantial variations existed in the income sources and the standard of living in these villages. Forest income varied dramatically among the three village classes, with inner villages having greater forest income than fringe villages and outer villages. Meanwhile, households in outer villages depended on forests and engaged in diverse economic activities for their livelihoods. Compared with inner and fringe villages, households in outer villages derived a significant portion of their income from livestock. This discrepancy can be attributed to challenges, such as inadequate transportation, communication, and underdeveloped market chains in inner villages. Moreover, these findings emphasize the need to develop sustainable forest management practices, create alternative income-generation opportunities, and improve infrastructure and market access in inner villages, as well as promote economic diversification in outer villages. Through targeted policy measures, these forest-rich regions can achieve improved livelihoods, enhanced standard of living, and increased resilience for their communities.

Key words: Non-timber forest products (NTFPs), Forest resources, Standard of living index, Livelihood dependency index, Income sources, India