Full Length Article

Leveraging farm heterogeneity to enhance living incomes: A gender-sensitive typology of cocoa farming systems in Côte d’Ivoire

  • Franziska OLLENDORF ,
  • Claudia CORAL ,
  • Constant Yves ADOU YAO ,
  • Stefan SIEBER ,
  • Katharina L?HR
Expand
  • aLeibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Müncheberg, 15374, Germany
    bAgrifood Chain Management, Humboldt Universit?t zu Berlin, Berlin, 10099, Germany
    cTeaching and Research Unit Biosciences, Félix Houphou?t Boigny University, Abidjan, 00225, C?te d’Ivoire
    dResource Economics, Humboldt Universit?t zu Berlin, Berlin, 10099, Germany
    eUrban Plant Ecophysiology, Humboldt Universit?t zu Berlin, Berlin, 10099, Germany
*E-mail address: franziska.ollendorf@zalf.de (Franziska OLLENDORF).

Received date: 2024-08-21

  Revised date: 2025-06-16

  Online published: 2025-09-15

Abstract

About 44% of the world’s cocoa is produced in one single country, Côte d’Ivoire. Providing this important raw material, most Ivorian cocoa farmers live in severe poverty, which, despite a multitude of sector interventions, is still widespread, affecting social and environmental sustainability in cocoa production. In this context, cocoa farmers are still often treated as a homogeneous group of small-scale producers (mainly males), resulting in interventions being conceptualized as one-size-fits-all approaches and failing to deliver support schemes that take farmers’ specific conditions appropriately into account. Applying a broader typology approach that combines farm characteristics with farmers’ characteristics, this study aims to delineate Ivorian cocoa farmers and their farms into specific types in order to improve advice for targeted sustainability interventions and living income (LI) potentials. Principal component analysis and hierarchical clustering analysis of a household dataset collected in 2022 in five cocoa-growing regions of Côte d’Ivoire were chosen to identify types of male-headed farms. To assure gender sensitive analysis, a female-headed farm type was created artificially. The specific characteristics of the identified types were captured using descriptive analysis. Descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests were then applied to examine the relationships between these farm types and various outcomes. Additionally, a binary logistic model was used to estimate the probability of these links in relation to variables relevant for achieving a LI. Finally, Spearman non-parametric correlation was used to identify eventual differences in the strength of relationships between key variables per farm type. Three different types of male-headed farms are identified: type 1 (the most productive and diversified farms with larger size), type 2 (middle-sized farms with strong focus on cash crops), and type 3 (small-sized farms with a good level of diversification for self-consumption). The artificially created type 4 represents female-headed farms with the smallest size. On average, none of these farm types achieves a LI. However, type 1 shows the smallest LI gap, while type 4 is by far the worst. Our analyses reveal underlying socio-economic factors systematically disadvantaging female-headed cocoa farms, most notably limited access to land and other material assets. The key contribution of this study lies in the empirical identification of the different characteristics of farms in a given farming system, thereby identifying the need for targeted support interventions. Type-specific recommendations are made, showing pathways to provide tailored programs to farmers of different types in order to reduce their LI gaps.

Cite this article

Franziska OLLENDORF , Claudia CORAL , Constant Yves ADOU YAO , Stefan SIEBER , Katharina L?HR . Leveraging farm heterogeneity to enhance living incomes: A gender-sensitive typology of cocoa farming systems in Côte d’Ivoire[J]. Regional Sustainability, 2025 , 6(4) : 100245 . DOI: 10.1016/j.regsus.2025.100245

References

[1] Abdulai I., Jassogne L., Graefe S., et al., 2018. Characterization of cocoa production, income diversification and shade tree management along a climate gradient in Ghana. PLoS One. 13(4), e0195777, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195777.
[2] Alvarez S., Paas W., Descheemaeker K., et al., 2014. Typology Construction, A Way of Dealin with Farm Diversity: General Guidelines for Humidtropics. Wageningen: Wageningen University.
[3] Alvarez S., Timler C.J., Michalscheck M., et al., 2018. Capturing farm diversity with hypothesis-based typologies: An innovative methodological framework for farming system typology development. PLoS One. 13(5), e0194757, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194757.
[4] Andersen E., Elbersen B., Godeschalk F., et al., 2007. Farm management indicators and farm typologies as a basis for assessments in a changing policy environment. J. Environ. Manage. 82(3), 353-362.
[5] Asumang-Yeboah D., Ameyaw J.A.S., Acheampong E., et al., 2025. Access or exclusion to land: An overview of evolving trends in cocoa landscapes in Ghana. World Dev. Perspect. 37, 100651, doi: 10.1016/j.wdp.2024.100651.
[6] Bah A., Laven A., 2019. Closing the income gap of cocoa households in C?te d’Ivoire - taking a gender-sensitive household approach. [2024-07-25]. https://www.kakaoforum.de/fileadmin/Redaktion/Studien/2019_KIT_Closing_the_income_gap_of_cocoa_households_in_Cote_d_Ivoire_-_taking_a_gender-sensitive_household_approac.pdf.
[7] Bahrun A., Fahimuddin M.Y., Rakian T.C., et al., 2018. Cocoa pod husk biochar reduce watering frequency and increase cocoa seedlings growth. International Journal of Environment, Agriculture and Biotechnology. 3(5), 1635-1639.
[8] Bartkowski B., Schü?ler C., Müller B., 2022. Typologies of European farmers: approaches, methods and research gaps. Reg. Envir. Chang. 22(2), 43, doi: 10.1007/s10113-022-01899-y.
[9] Bisseleua D.H.D., Idrissou L., Ogunniyi A., et al., 2018. Diversification and livelihood strategies in the cocoa belt of West Africa: The need for fundamental change. World Dev. Perspect. 10-12, 73-79.
[10] Busquet M., Bosma N., Hummels H., 2021. A multidimensional perspective on child labor in the value chain: The case of the cocoa value chain in West Africa. World Dev. 146, 105601, doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105601.
[11] Bymolt R., Laven A., Tyszler M., 2018. Demystifying the cocoa sector in Ghana and C?te d’Ivoire. In: KIT Royal Tropical Institute. Amsterdam, Nerherlands.
[12] Carr E.R., 2008. Men’s crops and women’s crops: The importance of gender to the understanding of agricultural and development outcomes in Ghana’s central region. World Dev. 36(5), 900-915.
[13] Danso-Abbeam G., Baiyegunhi L.J.S., Ojo T.O., 2020. Gender differentials in technical efficiency of Ghanaian cocoa farms. Heliyon. 6(5), e04012, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04012.
[14] Dixon J., Gulliver A., Gibbon D., et al., 2001. Farming Systems and Poverty: Improving Farmers’ Livelihoods in a Changing World. Rome and Washington: FAO and World Bank.
[15] Djokoto J.G., Afari-Sefa V., Addo-Quaye A., 2017. Vegetable diversification in cocoa-based farming systems Ghana. Agric. Food Secur. 6(1), 6, doi: 10.1186/s40066-016-0082-4.
[16] Duguma B., Gockowski J., Bakala J., 2001. Smallholder Cacao (Theobroma cacao Linn.) cultivation in agroforestry systems of West and Central Africa: challenges and opportunities. Agrofor. Syst. 51(3), 177-188.
[17] Ferry Y., Herman M., Tarigan E.B., et al., 2022. Improvements of soil quality and cocoa productivity with agricultural waste biochar. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 974(1), 12045, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/974/1/012045.
[18] Fontaine A., Hütz-Adams F., 2022. Cocoa Barometer. [2024-07-05]. https://voicenetwork.cc/cocoa-barometer/.
[19] Fountain A.C., 2023. Good Purchasing Practices in Cocoa, a Barometer Consultation Paper. [2024-07-05]. https://voicenetwork.cc/resources/?_categorie_resources=sustainability-research-database.
[20] Friedman R., Hirons M.A., Boyd E., 2019. Vulnerability of Ghanaian women cocoa farmers to climate change: a typology. Clim. Dev. 11(5), 446-458.
[21] GEFAK(Gesellschaft Für Angewandte Kommunalforschung) , 2015. Study on the state of farmer cooperatives in the cocoa sector of C?te d’Ivoire. [2024-07-25]. https://www.readkong.com/page/study-on-the-state-of-farmer-cooperatives-in-the-cocoa-7563626.
[22] Huber R., Bartkowski B., Brown C., et al., 2024. Farm typologies for understanding farm systems and improving agricultural policy. Agric. Syst. 213, 103800, doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103800.
[23] Ingram V., Van Rijn F., Waarts Y., et al., 2018. The impacts of cocoa sustainability initiatives in West Africa. Sustainability. 10(11), 4249, doi: 10.3390/su10114249.
[24] International Cocoa Organization, 2023. November 2023 Quarterly Bulletin of Cocoa Statistics. [2024-06-30]. https://www.icco.org/november-2023-quarterly-bulletin-of-cocoa-statistics/.
[25] Kasim N., Mustari K., Iswari I., et al., 2021. Effect of the application of chicken manure compost tea on the growth of certified cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) seedlings. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 807(4), 42050, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/807/4/042050.
[26] Knudsen M.H., Agergaard J., 2015. Ghana’s cocoa frontier in transition: the role of migration and livelihood diversification. Geogr. Ann. Ser. B-Human Geogr. 97(4), 325-342.
[27] Koné M., 2011. Teaching Guide to Understand, Ask the Right Questions, and Take Action on Land Issues in West Africa. [2024-06-30]. http://www.socioeco.org/bdf_fiche-document-510_fr.html (in French).
[28] Kruskal W.H., Wallis W.A., 1952. Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 47(260), 583-621.
[29] Kuhn M., Tennhardt L., Lazzarini G.A., 2023. Gender inequality in the cocoa supply chain: Evidence from smallholder production in Ecuador and Uganda. World Development Sustainability. 2, 100034, doi: 10.1016/j.wds.2022.100034.
[30] LeBaron G., Gore E., 2020. Gender and forced labour: Understanding the links in global cocoa supply chains. The Journal of Development Studies. 56(6), 1095-1117.
[31] L?hr K., Aruqaj B., Baumert D., et al., 2021. Social cohesion as the missing link between natural resource management and peacebuilding: Lessons from cocoa production in C?te d’Ivoire and Colombia. Sustainability. 13(23), 13002, doi: 10.3390/su132313002.
[32] Merem E.C., Twumasi Y.A., Wesley J., et al., 2020. Exploring cocoa farm land use in the West African region. International Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. 10(1), 19-39.
[33] Molenaar J.W., Hütz-Adams F., Kessler J.J., et al., 2022. Price in Global Commodity Value Chains: Key to Achieving LI and Living Wage. [2024-07-10]. https://www.suedwind-institut.de/fileadmin/Suedwind/Publikationen/2023/2023_06_Price_in_Global_Commodity_Value_Chains_Key_to_Achieving_Living_Income_and_Living_Wage.pdf.
[34] Najafabadi H.A., Ozalp N., Davis R.A., 2021. Biochar from cocoa shell pyrolysis: Potential sorbent for CO2 capture. Journal of Energy Resources Technology. 143(2), 022302, doi: 10.1115/1.4047765.
[35] Njuki J., Eissler S., Malapit H., et al., 2022. A review of evidence on gender equality, women’s empowerment, and food systems. Global Food Security. 33, 100622, doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2022.100622.
[36] Ollendorf F., Coral C., Adou Y., et al., 2023. Different households-different challenges? Understanding the impacts of cocoa producers’ household characteristics on needs and ability to apply sustainable production techniques. In: International Symposium on Cocoa Research-ISCR 2022. Montpellier: International Symposium on Cocoa Research.
[37] Ollendorf F., 2024. The Transformative Potential of Corporate Social Responsibility in the Global Cocoa-Chocolate Chain: Insights from Sustainability Certification in Ghana. Wiesbaden: Springer.
[38] Osorio M., Gallina A., Jaskiewicz K., et al., 2019. Changing the terms of Women’s Engagement in Cocoa and Coffee Supply Chains. Rome and Amsterdam: FAO and KIT Royal Tropical Institute.
[39] Pierotti R.S., Friedson-Ridenour S., Olayiwola O., 2022. Women farm what they can manage: How time constraints affect the quantity and quality of labor for married women’s agricultural production in southwestern Nigeria. World Dev. 152, 105800, doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105800.
[40] ProForest, 2022. EU Regulation on Deforestation-Free Products: Operational Guidance for Cocoa Producers and Importers. [2024-07-22]. https://www.proforest.net/resources/publications/deforestation-due-diligence-reference-document-for-cocoa-producers-and-importers/.
[41] Ruf F., Galo Kla A.G., Dja K., et al., 2015. Chicken Manure in the Cocoa Plantations of C?te d’Ivoire. An Agro-ecological and Social Revolution. [2024-07-22]. https://www.inter-reseaux.org/wp-content/uploads/ruf_chicken_manure_in_the_cocoa_plantations_of_cote_d_ivoire.pdf/.
[42] Ruf F., Schroth G., 2015. Economics and Ecology of Diversification. Netherlands: Springer.
[43] Ruf F., 2022. Covid-19, living income differential and decline in cocoa producers’ incomes in C?te d’Ivoire. Cah. Agric. 31, 25, doi: 10.1051/cagri/2022022(in French).
[44] Sennuga S.O., Isola E.O., Dahunsi O.M., et al., 2024. Assessing the socio-economic implication of fragmented land holdings on smallholder farming communities in Ile-Oluji/Okeigbo local government area, Ondo State, Nigeria. Nigeria Journal of Development and Society, Faculty of Social Science. 6(1), 50-67.
[45] Shukla R., Agarwal A., Gornott C., et al., 2019. Farmer typology to understand differentiated climate change adaptation in Himalaya. Sci Rep. 9(1), 20375, doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56931-9.
[46] Tham-Agyekum E.K., Boansi D., Wongnaa C.A., et al., 2023. A gender differential analysis of determinants of pesticide application in cocoa system farming of Ghana. Cogent Soc. Sci. 9(2), 2256512, doi: 10.1080/23311886.2023.2256512.
[47] The Living Income Community of Practice, 2024. The Concept. [2024-07-05]. https://www.living-income.com/.
[48] Tittonell P., Muriuki A., Shepherd K.D., et al., 2010. The diversity of rural livelihoods and their influence on soil fertility in agricultural systems of East Africa - A typology of smallholder farms. Agric. Syst. 103(2), 83-97.
[49] Tyszler M., Laven A., Bymolt R., 2019. Analysis of the income gap of cocoa producing households in C?te d’Ivoire. In: KIT Royal Tropical Institute. Amsterdam, Nerherlands.
[50] van de Ven, G.W.J., Marinus W., et al., 2021. Living income benchmarking of rural households in low-income countries. Food Secur. 13(3), 729-749.
[51] van Vliet J.A., Slingerland M.A., Waarts Y.R., et al., 2021. A living income for cocoa producers in C?te d’Ivoire and Ghana? Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 5, 732831, doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2021.732831.
[52] Voora V., Bermúdez S., Larrea C., 2019. Global Market Report:Cocoa. Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development.
[53] Waarts Y., Janssen V., Koster T., et al., 2024. Unlocking Targeted Approaches to Improve Household Resilience of Cocoa Farmers. The Hague: Wageningen Economic Research.
[54] Waarts Y.R., Janssen V., Aryeetey R., et al., 2021. Multiple pathways towards achieving a living income for different types of smallholder tree-crop commodity farmers. Food Secur. 13(6), 1467-1496.
Outlines

/