Full Length Article

Residents’ attitudes and behaviours on private green spaces in the suburban areas of Central European countries

  • Tamás HARDI ,
  • ádám PáTHY ,
  • Andrea POZSGAI
Expand
  • aHungarian Research Network Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, Institute for Regional Studies West Hungarian Research Department, Györ, H-9022, Hungary
    bDepartment of Regional Science and Rural Development, Albert Kázmér Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences of Széchenyi István University, Mosonmagyaróvár, H-9200, Hungary
    cDepartment of Social Science and Sociology, Apáczai Csere János Faculty of Széchenyi István University, Györ, H-9022, Hungary
*E-mail address: hardi.tamas@krtk.hun-ren.hu (Tamás HARDI).

Received date: 2024-03-28

  Revised date: 2024-07-26

  Accepted date: 2024-11-20

  Online published: 2024-12-19

Abstract

Green spaces in urban and suburban areas play a significant role in helping settlements adapt to climate change. The design, quantity, quality, and location of green spaces influence their ability to provide benefits to people and enhance the quality of life. Private green spaces, if adequately managed, can enhance the environmental quality. This study, based on a questionnaire survey and the Motivation/Attitude-Driven Behaviour (MADB) model, investigated how the attitudes and behaviours of residents shape private green spaces in 12 settlements of the 4 city regions (Cluj region, Nitra region, Kecskemét region, and Györ region) in 3 Central European countries (Hungary, Slovakia, and Romania). The results showed that beautiful natural environment, abundance of green spaces, beautiful settlement and streetscape, and village atmosphere were mentioned most often, along with good quality of life, with a mention rate of over 70.00% in the four city regions. Convenience also played a significant role in the management of green spaces, showing that convenience factors (less work, less waste, and cheaper management) more important for those who live in settlements nearer to the cities. The importance of biodiversity and ecology was positively correlated with socio-economic status such as education and financial situation. However, the importance of the utility of green spaces was less prevalent among original villagers and settlers. Moreover, we found that the percentage of green spaces of settlers is slightly higher than that of original villagers. The results of factor analysis revealed that socio-economic status can influence respondents’ attitudes towards green spaces. It suggests to increase ecological awareness of residents, especially for new settlers, and promote good management techniques for green spaces. This study can improve the awareness of urban planners about the importance of green spaces in suburban areas.

Cite this article

Tamás HARDI , ádám PáTHY , Andrea POZSGAI . Residents’ attitudes and behaviours on private green spaces in the suburban areas of Central European countries[J]. Regional Sustainability, 2024 , 5(4) : 100180 . DOI: 10.1016/j.regsus.2024.100180

References

[1] Ambrey, C., Byrne, J., Matthews, T., et al., 2017. Cultivating climate justice: Green infrastructure and suburban disadvantage in Australia. Appl. Geogr. 89, 52-60.
[2] Angel, S., Parent, J., Civco, D.L., et al., 2011. The dimensions of global urban expansion: Estimates and projections for all countries, 2000-2050. Prog. Plan. 75(2), 53-107.
[3] Antrop, M., 2005. Why landscapes of the past are important for the future. Landsc. Urban Plan. 70(1), 21-34.
[4] Aram, F., Higueras García, E., Solgi, E., et al., 2019. Urban green space cooling effect in cities. Heliyon. 5(4), 01339, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01339.
[5] Bürgi, M., Bieling, C., von Hackwitz, K., et al., 2017. Processes and driving forces in changing cultural landscapes across Europe. Landscape Ecol. 32(11), 2097-2112.
[6] Byrne, J.A., Lo, A.Y., Yang, J.J., 2015. Residents’ understanding of the role of green infrastructure for climate change adaptation in Hangzhou, China. Landsc. Urban Plan. 138, 132-143.
[7] Cameron, R.W.F., Blanu?a, T., Taylor, J.E., et al., 2012. The domestic garden—Its contribution to urban green infrastructure. Urban For Urban Gree. 11(2), 129-137.
[8] Chang, J., Qu, Z.L., Xu, R.H., et al., 2017. Assessing the ecosystem services provided by urban green spaces along urban center-edge gradients. Sci. Reports. 7(1), 11226, doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-11559-5.
[9] Csomós, G., Farkas, J.Z., Kovács, Z., 2020. Access to urban green spaces and environmental inequality in post-socialist cities. Hungarian Geogr. Bul. 69(2), 191-207.
[10] Csontos, P., Kalapos, T., Faradhimu, T., et al., 2020. Effects of tree size and park maintenance on soil seed bank of Gleditsia triacanthos, an exotic tree in urban green areas. Biol. Futura, 71(1-2), 81-91.
[11] Darly, S., Feuillet, T., Laforêt, C., 2021. Home gardening and the social divide of suburban space: Methodological proposal for the spatial analysis of a social practice in the Greater Paris Urban Area. Sustainability Basel. 13(6), 3243, doi: 10.3390/su13063243.
[12] De Sousa Silva, C., Viegas, I., Panagopoulos, T., et al., 2018. Environmental justice in accessibility to green infrastructure in two European cities. Land Basel. 7(134), 1-23.
[13] Dumitrache, L., Zamfir, D., Nae, M.M., et al., 2016. The urban nexus: Contradictions and dilemmas of (post)communist (sub)urbanization in Romania. Human Geogr. 10(1), 38-50.
[14] EEA (European Environment Agency), 2016. Urban Sprawl in Europe. [2024-01-15]. https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/urban-sprawl-in-europe.
[15] Forman, R.T.T., Wilson, E.O., 1995. Land Mosaics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 406-435.
[16] Forman, R.T.T., 2008. Urban Regions:Ecology and Planning Beyond the City. Cambridge: University Press Cambridge, 164-222.
[17] Gangopadhyay, K., Balooni, K., 2012. Technological infusion and the change in private, urban green spaces. Urban For. Urban Gree. 11(2), 205-210.
[18] Gardi, C., 2017. Is urban expansion a problem? In: Gardi, C., (ed.). Urban Expansion, Land Cover and Soil Ecosystem Services. London: Routledge, 3-18.
[19] Graffigna, S., González-Vaquero, R.A., Torretta, J.P., et al., 2023. Importance of urban green areas’ connectivity for the conservation of pollinators. Urban Ecosyst. 27, 417-426.
[20] Grigorescu, I., Mitric?, B., Kucsicsa, G., et al., 2012. Post-communist land use changes related to urban sprawl in the Romanian metropolitan areas. Human Geogr. 6(1), 35-46.
[21] Hall, T., 2010. Goodbye to the backyard?—The minimisation of private open space in the Australian Outer-Suburban Estate. Urban Policy Res. 28(4), 411-433.
[22] Hardi, T., Repaská, G., Veselovsky, J., et al., 2020. Environmental consequences of the urban sprawl in the suburban zone of Nitra: An analysis based on landcover data. Geographica Pannonica. 24(3), 205-220.
[23] Hardi, T., 2022. Differences and similarities in the expansion of suburban built-up areas around the different city regions of three Central European countries. Space and Society. 36(3), 165-193.
[24] Hlavá?ek, P., Kopá?ek, M., Horá?ková, L., 2019. Impact of suburbanisation on sustainable development of settlements in suburban spaces: Smart and new solutions. Sustainability Basel. 11(24), 7182, doi: 10.3390/su11247182.
[25] Hu, X.W., Su, Y.Q., Ren, K.F., et al., 2021. Measurement and influencing factors of urban traffic ecological resilience in developing countries: A case study of 31 Chinese cities. Reg. Sustain. 2(3), 211-223.
[26] Ilbery, B., 2014. The Geography of Rural Change. London: Routledge, 131-160.
[27] Johnson, M.P., 2001. Environmental impacts of urban sprawl: A survey of the literature and proposed research agenda. Environ. Plan. A. 33(4), 717-735.
[28] Kahn, M.E., 2000. The environmental impact of suburbanization. J. Policy Anal. Manag. 19(4), 569-586.
[29] Lagucki, E., Burdine, J.D., McCluney, K.E., 2017. Urbanization alters communities of flying arthropods in parks and gardens of a medium-sized city. PeerJ. 5, e3620, doi: 10.7717/peerj.3620.
[30] Lennert, J., Farkas, J.Z., Kovács, A.D., et al., 2020. Measuring and predicting long-term land cover changes in the functional urban area of Budapest. Sustainability Basel. 12(8), 3331, doi: 10.3390/su12083331.
[31] Li, Q.Z, Thapa, S., Hu, X.L., et al., 2022. The relationship between urban green space and urban expansion based on gravity methods. Sustainability Basel. 14(9), 5396, doi: 10.3390/su14095396.
[32] Lian, Z.X., Feng, X.H., 2022. Urban green space pattern in core cities of the greater bay area based on morphological spatial pattern analysis. Sustainability Basel. 14(19), 12365, doi: 10.3390/su141912365.
[33] Liu, Q., Peng, P.H., Wang, Y.K., et al., 2019. Microclimate regulation efficiency of the rural homegarden agroforestry system in the Western Sichuan Plain, China. J. Mt. Sci-Engl. 16(3), 516-528.
[34] Mahmoudi Farahani, L., Maller, C., Phelan, K., 2018. Private gardens as urban greenspaces: Can they compensate for poor greenspace access in lower socioeconomic neighbourhoods? Landscape Online. 59, doi: 10.3097/LO.201859.
[35] Martínez-Sastre, R., Ravera, F., González, J.A., et al., 2017. Mediterranean landscapes under change: Combining social multicriteria evaluation and the ecosystem services framework for land use planning. Land Use Pol. 67, 472-486.
[36] Matthews, T., Lo, A.Y., Byrne, J.A., 2015. Reconceptualizing green infrastructure for climate change adaptation: Barriers to adoption and drivers for uptake by spatial planners. Landsc. Urban Plan. 138, 155-163.
[37] Repaská, G., Vilinová, K., ?olcová, L., 2017. Trends in development of residential areas in suburban zone of the city of Nitra (Slovakia). Eur. Countrys. 9(2), 287-301.
[38] Russo, A., Escobedo, F.J., Cirella, G.T., et al., 2017. Edible green infrastructure: An approach and review of provisioning ecosystem services and disservices in urban environments. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 242, 53-66.
[39] S?geat?, R., Mitric?, B., Cercleux, A.L., et al., 2023. Deindustrialization, tertiarization and suburbanization in central and eastern Europe. Lessons learned from Bucharest City, Romania. Land Basel. 12(9), 1731, doi: 10.3390/land12091731.
[40] Semeraro, T., Scarano, A., Buccolieri, R., et al., 2021. Planning of urban green spaces: An ecological perspective on human benefits. Land Basel. 10, 105, doi: 10.3390/land10020105.
[41] Siedentop, S., Fina, S., 2012. Who sprawls most? Exploring the patterns of urban growth across 26 European countries. Environ. Plan. A. 44(11), 2765-2784.
[42] Slaev, A., Nedovic-Budic, Z., 2016. The challenges of implementing sustainable development: The case of Sofia’s master plan. Sustainability Basel. 9(1), 15, doi: 10.3390/su9010015.
[43] Svobodová, I., Drlík, J., Spě?ná, D., et al., 2021. Food self-provisioning in the Czech Republic—A comparison of suburban and peripheral regions of Rural South Moravia. Eur. Countrys. 13(3), 516-535.
[44] Taubenb?ck, H., Gerten, C., Rusche, K., et al., 2019. Patterns of Eastern European urbanisation in the mirror of Western trends—Convergent, unique or hybrid? Environ. Plan. B. 46(7), 1206-1225.
[45] UN-DESAPD (United Nations-Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Dynamics), 2019. World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision. [2024-01-15]. .https://population.un.org/wup/Publi-catio-ns/Files/WUP2018-Report.pdf.
[46] Wang, Y.X., 2007. On the cognitive processes of human perception with emotions, motivations, and attitudes. Int. J. Cognitive Informatics Nat. Intelligence. 1(4), 1-13.
[47] Warhurst, J.R., Parks, K.E., McCulloch, L., et al., 2014. Front gardens to car parks: Changes in garden permeability and effects on flood regulation. Sci. Total Environ. 485-486, 329-339.
[48] Zhou, L., Huang, X.Y., Zhao, C.M., et al., 2022. Regional landscape transformation and sustainability of the rural homegarden agroforestry system in the Chengdu Plain, China. Reg. Sustain. 3(1), 68-81.
Outlines

/