Regional Sustainability ›› 2026, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (4): 100369.doi: 10.1016/j.regsus.2026.100369
• Research article • Previous Articles Next Articles
NIU Zhiyuana, WEN Taob, TAN Feifeib,*(
)
Received:2025-08-25
Revised:2026-04-13
Accepted:2026-07-15
Published:2026-08-30
Online:2026-08-05
Contact:
*E-mail address: tanfei129x@163.com (TAN Feifei).
NIU Zhiyuan, WEN Tao, TAN Feifei. Uncovering multiple roles of green innovation in urban sustainable development efficiency in China[J]. Regional Sustainability, 2026, 7(4): 100369.
Table 1
Index for evaluating the efficiency of sustainable urban development."
| Dimension | Standardized layer | Index | Unit | Orientation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Driving | Economic and social activities | Natural increase rate | % | + |
| Urbanization rate | % | + | ||
| Pressure | Depletion of resources | Per capita water consumption | m3/person | - |
| Size of built-up area | km | - | ||
| Environmental pollution | Industrial wastewater emissions | t | - | |
| Industrial soot emissions | t | - | ||
| State | Economic and social status | Per capita gross domestic product (GDP) | CNY/person | + |
| Per capita disposable income of urban resident | CNY/person | + | ||
| Retail sales of consumer goods as a share of GDP | CNY | + | ||
| Comparative labor productivity | / | + | ||
| Environmental state | Per capita green space | hm2/person | + | |
| Impact | Economic potential | Per capita investment in fixed asset | CNY/person | + |
| Per capita saving | CNY/person | + | ||
| Human health | Life expectancy | / | + | |
| Response | Pollution control | Comprehensive utilization rate of general industrial solid waste | % | + |
| Non-hazardous domestic waste disposal rate | % | + | ||
| Investment and construction | Science and technology expenditure as a share of GDP | % | + | |
| GDP share of investment in environmental infrastructure | % | + |
Table 2
Descriptive statistics of the selected variables."
| Abbreviation | Variable | Observations | Mean | Standard deviation | Minimum | Maximum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USDE | Urban sustainable development efficiency | 5320 | 0.282 | 0.318 | 0.000 | 1.283 |
| GI | Green innovation | 5320 | 0.105 | 0.223 | 0.000 | 1.375 |
| Ginv | Invention-based green innovation | 5320 | 0.028 | 0.077 | 0.000 | 0.512 |
| Guti | Utility model green innovation | 5320 | 0.087 | 0.190 | 0.000 | 1.219 |
| lngov | Government scale | 5320 | 0.162 | 0.078 | 0.056 | 0.469 |
| lnfin | Financial development level | 5320 | 0.754 | 0.433 | -1.131 | 1.909 |
| edu | Educational level | 5320 | 0.180 | 0.043 | 0.085 | 0.288 |
| unemp | Unemployment rate | 5320 | 0.006 | 0.004 | 0.001 | 0.024 |
| lnsoc | Level of social security and benefit | 5320 | 1.616 | 0.756 | -1.273 | 2.841 |
| lndoc | Medical level | 5320 | 1.078 | 0.165 | 0.632 | 1.444 |
Table 3
Basic regression model results of green innovation and urban sustainable development efficiency."
| Variable | (1) USDE | (2) USDE | (3) USDE | (4) USDE | (5) USDE | (6) USDE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GI | 0.055** (0.026) | 0.084*** (0.027) | - | - | - | - |
| Ginv | - | - | 0.179*** (0.075) | 0.226*** (0.076) | - | - |
| Guti | - | - | - | - | 0.057* (0.029) | 0.089*** (0.030) |
| lngov | - | 0.252* (0.141) | - | 0.239* (0.140) | - | 0.246* (0.141) |
| lnfin | - | 0.006 (0.024) | - | 0.006 (0.024) | - | 0.006 (0.024) |
| lndoc | - | -0.028 (0.051) | - | -0.024 (0.052) | - | -0.029* (0.051) |
| lnsoc | - | -0.227*** (0.025) | - | -0.223*** (0.025) | - | -0.226*** (0.025) |
| unemp | - | 0.164 (1.418) | - | 0.227 (1.148) | - | 0.179 (1.418) |
| edu | - | 0.348** (0.161) | - | 0.348** (0.161) | - | 0.353** (0.161) |
| Year fixed effect | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| City fixed effect | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Constant | 0.277*** (0.004) | 0.335*** (0.072) | 0.277*** (0.004) | 0.332*** (0.072) | 0.277*** (0.004) | 0.337*** (0.072) |
| R | 0.456 | 0.465 | 0.457 | 0.465 | 0.456 | 0.465 |
Table 4
Heterogeneity test results based on different city sizes."
| Variable | Large cities | Small to medium-sized cities | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) USDE | (2) USDE | (3) USDE | (4) USDE | (5) USDE | (6) USDE | |
| GI | 0.124*** (0.039) | - | - | 0.003 (0.051) | - | - |
| Ginv | - | 0.294*** (0.104) | - | - | 0.017 (0.167) | - |
| Guti | - | - | 0.134*** (0.043) | - | - | 0.009 (0.055) |
| lngov | -0.738** (0.333) | -0.765** (0.333) | -0.739** (0.333) | 0.481*** (0.156) | 0.481*** (0.156) | 0.478*** (0.156) |
| lnfin | 0.033 (0.051) | 0.029 (0.051) | 0.032 (0.051) | 0.002 (0.028) | 0.002 (0.028) | 0.003 (0.028) |
| lndoc | 0.045 (0.110) | 0.053 (0.111) | 0.042 (0.110) | -0.037 (0.058) | -0.037 (0.058) | -0.037 (0.058) |
| lnsoc | -0.349*** (0.049) | -0.344*** (0.049) | -0.347*** (0.049) | -0.182*** (0.029) | -0.182*** (0.029) | -0.182*** (0.029) |
| unemp | -2.275 (2.391) | -2.144 (2.391) | -2.267 (2.391) | 0.847 (1.767) | 0.850 (1.767) | 0849 (1.767) |
| edu | -0.241 (0.317) | -0.257 (0.318) | -0.239 (0.317) | 0.480** (0.191) | 0.480** (0.191) | 0.481** (0.191) |
| Year fixed effect | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| City fixed effect | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Constant | 0.867*** (0.160) | 0.868*** (0.161) | 0.872*** (0.160) | 0.160** (0.081) | 0.159** (0.081) | 0.161*** (0.081) |
| R | 0.554 | 0.553 | 0.553 | 0.378 | 0.378 | 0.378 |
Table 5
Heterogeneity test results of the cluster and non-cluster cities."
| Variable | Cluster city | Non-cluster city | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) USDE | (2) USDE | (3) USDE | (4) USDE | (5) USDE | (6) USDE | |
| GI | 0.083*** (0.032) | - | - | 0.053 (0.059) | - | - |
| Ginv | - | 0.164* (0.091) | - | - | 0.245 (0.159) | - |
| Guti | - | - | 0.091*** (0.035) | - | - | 0.041 (0.065) |
| lngov | -0.229 (0.220) | -0.238 (0.220) | -0.231 (0.220) | 0.709*** (0.191) | 0.716*** (0.191) | 0.702*** (0.191) |
| lnfin | 0.066* (0.036) | 0.059* (0.036) | 0.066* (0.036) | -0.063* (0.035) | -0.065* (0.035) | -0.062* (0.035) |
| lndoc | -0.168** (0.076) | -0.167** (0.076) | -0.169** (0.076) | 0.126* (0.071) | 0.131* (0.071) | 0.126* (0.071) |
| lnsoc | -0.294*** (0.034) | -0.289*** (0.033) | -0.293*** (0.034) | -0.148*** (0.039) | -0.146*** (0.038) | -0.148*** (0.039) |
| unemp | -2.420 (1.956) | -2.208 (1.954) | -2.410 (1.955) | 2.483 (2.063) | 2.462 (2.061) | 2.482 (2.063) |
| edu | 0.649*** (0.229) | 0.659*** (0.231) | 0.653*** (0.229) | -0.002 (0.227) | 0.003 (0.226) | 0.0003 (0.227) |
| Year fixed effect | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| City fixed effect | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Constant | 0.614*** (0.108) | 0.618*** (0.108) | 0.616*** (0.108) | 0.064 (0.098) | 0.058 (0.098) | 0.065 (0.098) |
| R | 0.559 | 0.558 | 0.558 | 0.313 | 0.313 | 0.313 |
Table 6
Endogeneity test results by the System Generalized Method of Moments."
| Variable | (1) USDE | (2) USDE | (3) USDE |
|---|---|---|---|
| L.USDE | 0.262*** (0.018) | 0.264*** (0.018) | 0.264*** (0.018) |
| GI | 0.105** (0.053) | - | - |
| Ginv | - | 0.265* (0.137) | - |
| Guti | - | - | 0.116** (0.057) |
| lngov | 0.421** (0.171) | 0.408** (0.163) | 0.386** (0.163) |
| lnfin | 0.012 (0.025) | 0.011 (0.025) | 0.015 (0.024) |
| lndoc | -0.117* (0.068) | -0.109 (0.067) | -0.129* (0.068) |
| lnsoc | -0.014 (0.021) | -0.010 (0.020) | -0.014 (0.021) |
| unemp | 0.190 (1.866) | -0.023 (2.089) | 0.039 (1.893) |
| edu | 0.351 (0.274) | 0.351 (0.265) | 0.340 (0.248) |
| Year fixed effect | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| City fixed effect | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Constant | 0.769*** (0.098) | 0.770*** (0.097) | 0.791*** (0.095) |
| Autocorrelation (1) P-value | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Autocorrelation (2) P-value | 0.302 | 0.293 | 0.309 |
| Hansen-P-value | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
Table 7
Robustness test for control variables based on difference-in-differences model."
| Variable | (1) USDE | (2) USDE | Variable | (1) USDE | (2) USDE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| did | 0.027* (0.015) | 0.034** (0.015) | edu | - | 0.379** (0.161) |
| lngov | - | 0.260* (0.142) | Year fixed effect | Yes | Yes |
| lnfin | - | -0.001 (0.025) | City fixed effect | Yes | Yes |
| lndoc | - | -0.029 (0.052) | Constant | 0.278*** (0.004) | 0.335*** (0.072) |
| lnsoc | - | -0.222*** (0.025) | R | 0.456 | 0.465 |
| unemp | - | 0.100 (1.421) |
Table 8
Robustness test based on green patent applications."
| Variable | (1) USDE | (2) USDE | (3) USDE | (4) USDE | (5) USDE | (6) USDE | (7) USDE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| gapp | 0.084** (0.041) | 0.087*** (0.042) | 0.084** (0.042) | 0.079* (0.042) | 0.080* (0.042) | 0.077* (0.042) | 0.103*** (0.042) |
| lngov | - | 0.147 (0.359) | 0.547 (0.400) | 0.465* (0.401) | 0.465 (0.401) | 0.649 (0.462) | 0.679** (0.461) |
| lnfin | - | - | -0.181** (0.080) | -0.174** (0.080) | -0.172** (0.080) | -0.185** (0.082) | -0.214*** (0.082) |
| lndoc | - | - | - | -0.478*** (0.179) | -0.477*** (0.179) | -0.469*** (0.179) | -0.369** (0.179) |
| unemp | - | - | - | - | 0.002 (0.004) | 0.002 (0.004) | 0.002 (0.004) |
| edu | - | - | - | - | - | 0.444 (0.553) | 0.744 (0.556) |
| lnsoc | - | - | - | - | - | - | -0.442*** (0.094) |
| Year fixed effect | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| City fixed effect | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Constant | -1.865*** (0.014) | -1.889*** (0.061) | -1.818*** (0.069) | -1.294*** (0.208) | -1.296*** (0.208) | -1.404*** (0.247) | -1.282*** (0.248) |
| R | 0.526 | 0.526 | 0.527 | 0.527 | 0.527 | 0.527 | 0.529 |
Table 9
Robustness test results based on the Slack Based Measure (SBM) model."
| Variable | (1) USDE | (2) USDE | (3) USDE |
|---|---|---|---|
| GI | 0.055* (0.028) | - | - |
| Ginv | - | 0.141* (0.079) | - |
| Guti | - | - | 0.059* (0.031) |
| lngov | 0.051 (0.147) | 0.042 (0.146) | 0.048 (0.146) |
| lnfin | 0.002 (0.025) | 0.002 (0.025) | 0.002 (0.025) |
| lndoc | 0.036 (0.054) | 0.038 (0.054) | 0.035 (0.054) |
| lnsoc | 0.192*** (0.032) | 0.194*** (0.026) | 0.192*** (0.026) |
| unemp | 2.055 (1.477) | 2.099 (1.477) | 2.062 (1.477) |
| edu | -0.471*** (0.168) | -0.469*** (0.168) | -0.469*** (0.168) |
| Year fixed effect | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| City fixed effect | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Constant | -0.351*** (0.075) | -0.353*** (0.075) | -0.350*** (0.075) |
| R | 0.396 | 0.396 | 0.396 |
Table 10
Moran’s I values for urban sustainable development efficiency and green innovation during 2004-2022."
| Year | Urban sustainable development efficiency | Green innovation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moran’s I | P-value | Moran’s I | P-value | |
| 2004 | 0.117 | 0.000 | 0.119 | 0.000 |
| 2005 | 0.072 | 0.006 | 0.131 | 0.000 |
| 2006 | 0.162 | 0.000 | 0.143 | 0.000 |
| 2007 | 0.156 | 0.000 | 0.162 | 0.000 |
| 2008 | 0.141 | 0.000 | 0.182 | 0.000 |
| 2009 | 0.140 | 0.000 | 0.215 | 0.000 |
| 2010 | 0.200 | 0.000 | 0.240 | 0.000 |
| 2011 | 0.083 | 0.002 | 0.286 | 0.000 |
| 2012 | 0.107 | 0.000 | 0.327 | 0.000 |
| 2013 | 0.145 | 0.000 | 0.334 | 0.000 |
| 2014 | 0.136 | 0.000 | 0.357 | 0.000 |
| 2015 | 0.226 | 0.000 | 0.319 | 0.000 |
| 2016 | 0.182 | 0.000 | 0.333 | 0.000 |
| 2017 | 0.164 | 0.000 | 0.327 | 0.000 |
| 2018 | 0.197 | 0.000 | 0.321 | 0.000 |
| 2019 | 0.185 | 0.000 | 0.320 | 0.000 |
| 2020 | 0.200 | 0.000 | 0.321 | 0.000 |
| 2021 | 0.221 | 0.000 | 0.308 | 0.000 |
| 2022 | 0.236 | 0.000 | 0.288 | 0.000 |
Table 13
Spatial regression results of green innovation and urban sustainable development efficiency."
| Variable | (1) USDE | (2) USDE | (3) USDE |
|---|---|---|---|
| GI | 0.111*** (0.026) | - | - |
| Ginv | - | 0.311*** (0.073) | - |
| Guti | - | - | 0.118*** (0.029) |
| lngov | -0.182 (0.113) | -0.188* (0.113) | -0.191* (0.113) |
| lnfin | 0.082*** (0.019) | 0.079*** (0.019) | 0.083*** (0.019) |
| lndoc | 0.085* (0.047) | 0.092* (0.047) | 0.084* (0.047) |
| lnsoc | -0.016 (0.016) | -0.015 (0.015) | -0.015 (0.016) |
| unemp | 1.305 (1.342) | 1.425 (1.341) | 1.376 (1.342) |
| edu | -0.058 (0.141) | -0.044 (0.140) | -0.052 (0.141) |
| Constant | -0.437*** (0.119) | -0.425*** (0.118) | -0.433*** (0.119) |
| W×GI | -0.149** (0.068) | - | - |
| W×Ginv | - | -0.205 (0.196) | - |
| W×Guti | - | - | -0.143* (0.076) |
| W×lngov | 0.329 (0.215) | 0.372* (0.214) | 0.349 (0.216) |
| W×lnfin | 0.088** (0.038) | 0.079** (0.038) | 0.086** (0.038) |
| W×lndoc | 0.210* (0.108) | 0.201* (0.108) | 0.208* (0.108) |
| W×lnsoc | 0.007 (0.038) | -0.009 (0.037) | 0.001 (0.038) |
| W×unemp | 14.627* (4.159) | 14.033*** (4.183) | 14.424*** (4.157) |
| W×edu | 0.849*** (0.292) | 0.833*** (0.292) | 0.842*** (0.292) |
| Year fixed effect | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| City fixed effect | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Spatial rho | 0.073*** (0.026) | 0.071*** (0.026) | 0.073*** (0.026) |
| Error term variance | 0.056*** (0.001) | 0.056*** (0.001) | 0.056*** (0.001) |
| R | 0.098 | 0.099 | 0.097 |
Table 14
Decomposition of the effect of green innovation on urban sustainable development efficiency."
| Variable | Direct effect | Indirect effect | Total effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| GI | 0.110*** (0.026) | -0.155** (0.072) | -0.045 (0.074) |
| lngov | -0.189** (0.096) | 0.349 (0.240) | 0.159 (0.242) |
| lnfin | 0.085*** (0.020) | 0.102** (0.044) | 0.187*** (0.043) |
| lndoc | 0.089* (0.052) | 0.245** (0.103) | 0.334*** (0.111) |
| lnsoc | -0.019 (0.099) | 0.003 (0.039) | -0.017 (0.039) |
| unemp | 1.470 (1.265) | 16.534*** (4.429) | 18.004*** (4.525) |
| edu | -0.049 (0.140) | 0.928*** (0.322) | 0.879** (0.350) |
Table 15
Decomposition of the effect of invention-based green innovation on urban sustainable development efficiency."
| Variable | Direct effect | Indirect effect | Total effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ginv | 0.309*** (0.073) | -0.204 (0.203) | 0.106 (0.210) |
| lngov | -0.196** (0.096) | 0.395* (0.239) | 0.199 (0.240) |
| lnfin | 0.083*** (0.020) | 0.092 (0.044) | 0.174*** (0.279) |
| lndoc | 0.096* (0.052) | 0.235** (0.101) | 0.331*** (0.109) |
| lnsoc | -0.018*** (0.018) | -0.015 (0.039) | -0.033 (0.039) |
| unemp | 1.581 (1.264) | 15.881*** (4.447) | 17.462*** (4.540) |
| edu | -0.036 (0.601) | 0.911*** (0.323) | 0.875** (0.351) |
Table 16
Decomposition of the effect of utility model green innovation on urban sustainable development efficiency."
| Variable | Direct effect | Indirect effect | Total effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guti | 0.117*** (0.029) | -0.149* (0.080) | -0.032 (0.083) |
| lngov | -0.199** (0.096) | 0.369 (0.240) | 0.170 (0.242) |
| lnfin | 0.086*** (0.020) | 0.099** (0.044) | 0.186**** (0.043) |
| lndoc | 0.089* (0.052) | 0.242** (0.103) | 0.331*** (0.111) |
| lnsoc | -0.019 (0.018) | -0.003 (0.039) | -0.021 (0.039) |
| unemp | 1.539 (1.265) | 16.318*** (4.426) | 17.857*** (4.524) |
| edu | -0.044 (0.140) | 0.921*** (0.322) | 0.878** (0.350) |
Table 17
Mechanism test based on energy efficiency improvement."
| Variable | (1) USDE | (2) Energy efficiency | (3) USDE |
|---|---|---|---|
| GI | 0.084*** (0.027) | 0.398*** (0.130) | 0.092*** (0.027) |
| lngov | 0.252* (0.141) | -0.424 (0.679) | 0.251* (0.140) |
| lnfin | 0.006 (0.024) | 0.996*** (0.118) | -0.001 (0.024) |
| lndoc | -0.028 (0.051) | -0.479* (0.249) | -0.023* (0.051) |
| lnsoc | -0.227*** (0.025) | -0.259** (0.123) | -0.224** (0.025) |
| unemp | 0.164 (1.418) | -14.269** (6.848) | 0.198 (1.417) |
| edu | 0.348** (0.161) | 0.916 (0.779) | 0.333** (0.161) |
| Energy efficiency | - | - | 0.034** (0.015) |
| Sobel test | - | - | 0.024*** (0.004) [5.665] |
| Mediated proportion | - | - | 0.146 |
| Year fixed effect | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| City fixed effect | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Constant | 0.335*** (0.072) | -2.846*** (0.347) | 0.366*** (0.073) |
| R | 0.465 | 0.784 | 0.784 |
Table 18
Mechanism test based on industrial structure upgrading."
| Variable | (1) USDE | (2) Industrial structure upgrading | (3) USDE |
|---|---|---|---|
| GI | 0.084*** (0.027) | 0.592*** (0.083) | 0.091*** (0.027) |
| lngov | 0.252* (0.141) | 0.479 (0.431) | 0.257* (0.141) |
| lnfin | 0.006 (0.024) | -0.762*** (0.075) | -0.003 (0.025) |
| lndoc | -0.028 (0.051) | 0.557*** (0.158) | -0.022 (0.052) |
| lnsoc | -0.227*** (0.025) | 0.369*** (0.078) | -0.222*** (0.025) |
| unemp | 0.164 (1.418) | 1.567 (4.339) | 0.183 (1.147) |
| edu | 0.348** (0.161) | -1.691*** (0.494) | 0.328** (0.161) |
| Industrial structure upgrading | - | - | 0.012*** (0.005) |
| Sobel test | - | - | 0.022*** (0.004) [5.702] |
| Mediated proportion | - | - | 0.134 |
| Year fixed effect | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| City fixed effect | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Constant | 0.335*** (0.072) | 0.139 (0.219) | 0.337*** (0.072) |
| R | 0.465 | 0.649 | 0.648 |
Table S1
Sample cities and their classification by urban scale."
| Province, autonomous region, or municipality | Large city | Small to medium-sized city |
|---|---|---|
| Beijing Municipality, Tianjin Municipality, Hebei Province, Shanxi Province, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Liaoning Province, Jilin Province, Heilongjiang Province, Shanghai Municipality, Jiangsu Province, Zhejiang Province, Anhui Province, Fujian Province, Jiangxi Province, Shandong Province, Henan Province, Hubei Province, Hunan Province, Guangdong Province, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Hainan Province, Chongqing Municipality, Sichuan Province, Guizhou Province, Yunnan province, Shaanxi Province, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Gansu Province, and Qinghai Province | Beijing, Tianjin, Shijiazhuang, Tangshan, Qinhuangdao, Handan, Baoding, Zhangjiakou, Taiyuan, Datong, Hohhot, Baotou, Shenyang, Dalian, Anshan, Fushun, Changchun, Jilin, Harbin, Qiqihar, Daqing, Shanghai, Nanjing, Wuxi, Xuzhou, Changzhou, Suzhou, Nantong, Huai’an, Yancheng, Yangzhou, Hangzhou, Ningbo, Wenzhou, Taizhou (Zhejiang), Hefei, Wuhu, Huainan, Fuzhou (Fujian), Xiamen, Quanzhou, Nanchang, Ganzhou, Jinan, Qingdao, Zibo, Zaozhuang, Yantai, Weifang, Jining, Tai’an, Linyi, Zhengzhou, Luoyang, Nanyang, Wuhan, Changsha, Zhuzhou, Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Zhuhai, Shantou, Foshan, Huizhou, Dongguan, Nanning, Liuzhou, Haikou, Chongqing, Chengdu, Zigong, Luzhou, Mianyang, Nanchong, Yibin, Dazhou, Guiyang, Zunyi, Kunming, Xi’an, Lanzhou, Xining, Yinchuan, and Urumqi | Xingtai, Chengde, Cangzhou, Langfang, Hengshui, Yangquan, Changzhi, Jincheng, Shuozhou, Jinzhong, Yuncheng, Xinzhou, Linfen, Lüliang, Wuhai, Chifeng, Tongliao, Ordos, Hulunbuir, Bayannur, Ulanqab, Benxi, Dandong, Jinzhou, Yingkou, Fuxin, Liaoyang, Panjin, Tieling, Chaoyang, Huludao, Siping, Liaoyuan, Tonghua, Baishan, Songyuan, Baicheng, Jixi, Hegang, Shuangyashan, Yichun, Jiamusi, Qitaihe, Mudanjiang, Heihe, Suihua, Lianyungang, Zhenjiang, Taizhou (Jiangsu), Suqian, Jiaxing, Huzhou, Shaoxing, Jinhua, Quzhou, Zhoushan, Lishui, Bengbu, Ma’anshan, Huaibei, Tongling, Anqing, Huangshan, Chuzhou, Fuyang, Suzhou (Anhui), Lu’an, Bozhou, Chizhou, Xuancheng, Putian, Sanming, Zhangzhou, Nanping, Longyan, Ningde, Jingdezhen, Pingxiang, Jiujiang, Xinyu, Yingtan, Ji’an, Yichun (Jiangxi), Fuzhou (Jiangxi), Shangrao, Dongying, Weihai, Rizhao, Dezhou, Liaocheng, Binzhou, Heze, Kaifeng, Pingdingshan, Anyang, Hebi, Xinxiang, Jiaozuo, Puyang, Xuchang, Luohe, Sanmenxia, Shangqiu, Xinyang, Zhoukou, Zhumadian, Huangshi, Shiyan, Yichang, Ezhou, Jingmen, Xiaogan, Jingzhou, Huanggang, Xianning, Suizhou, Xiangtan, Hengyang, Shaoyang, Yueyang, Changde, Zhangjiajie, Yiyang, Chenzhou, Yongzhou, Huaihua, Loudi, Shaoguan, Jiangmen, Zhanjiang, Maoming, Zhaoqing, Meizhou, Shanwei, Heyuan, Yangjiang, Qingyuan, Zhongshan, Chaozhou, Jieyang, Yunfu, Guilin, Wuzhou, Beihai, Fangchenggang, Qinzhou, Guigang, Yulin (Guangxi), Baise, Hezhou, Hechi, Laibin, Chongzuo, Panzhihua, Deyang, Guangyuan, Suining, Neijiang, Leshan, Meishan, Guang’an, Ya’an, Bazhong, Ziyang, Liupanshui, Anshun, Qujing, Yuxi, Baoshan, Zhaotong, Lijiang, Lincang, Tongchuan, Baoji, Xianyang, Weinan, Yan’an, Hanzhong, Yulin (Shaanxi), Ankang, Shangluo, Jiayuguan, Jinchang, Baiyin, Tianshui, Wuwei, Zhangye, Pingliang, Jiuquan, Qingyang, Dingxi, Longnan, Shizuishan, Wuzhong, Guyuan, and Karamay |
Table S2
Sample cities and their classification by urban type."
| Province, autonomous region, or municipality | Non-cluster city | Cluster city |
|---|---|---|
| Beijing Municipality, Tianjin Municipality, Hebei Province, Shanxi Province, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Liaoning Province, Jilin Province, Heilongjiang Province, Shanghai Municipality, Jiangsu Province, Zhejiang Province, Anhui Province, Fujian Province, Jiangxi Province, Shandong Province, Henan Province, Hubei Province, Hunan Province, Guangdong Province, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Hainan Province, Chongqing Municipality, Sichuan Province, Guizhou Province, Yunnan Province, Shaanxi Province, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Gansu Province, and Qinghai Province | Handan, Xingtai, Hengshui, Datong, Changzhi, Jincheng, Shuozhou, Yuncheng, Xinzhou, Linfen, Lüliang, Hohhot, Baotou, Wuhai, Chifeng, Tongliao, Ordos, Hulunbuir, Bayannur, Ulanqab, Chaoyang, Siping, Liaoyuan, Tonghua, Baishan, Baicheng, Jixi, Hegang, Shuangyashan, Yichun, Jiamusi, Qitaihe, Mudanjiang, Heihe, Suihua, Xuzhou, Lianyungang, Huai’an, Yancheng, Suqian, Wenzhou, Jinhua, Quzhou, Lishui, Huaibei, Huangshan, Fuyang, Suzhou (Anhui), Bozhou, Xuancheng, Sanming, Nanping, Longyan, Pingxiang, Xinyu, Ganzhou, Ji’an, Yichun (Jiangxi), Fuzhou (Jiangxi), Zaozhuang, Jining, Tai’an, Linyi, Dezhou, Liaocheng, Binzhou, Heze, Anyang, Hebi, Puyang, Sanmenxia, Nanyang, Shangqiu, Xinyang, Zhoukou, Zhumadian, Shiyan, Yichang, Jingmen, Jingzhou, Hengyang, Shaoyang, Yueyang, Changde, Zhangjiajie, Yiyang, Chenzhou, Yongzhou, Huaihua, Loudi, Shaoguan, Shantou, Zhanjiang, Maoming, Meizhou, Shanwei, Heyuan, Yangjiang, Qingyuan, Chaozhou, Jieyang, Yunfu, Liuzhou, Guilin, Wuzhou, Guigang, Yulin (Guangxi), Baise, Hezhou, Hechi, Laibin, Chongzuo, Haikou, Panzhihua, Liupanshui, Baoshan, Zhaotong, Lijiang, Lincang, Yan’an, Hanzhong, Yulin (Shaanxi), Ankang, Shangluo, Jiayuguan, Jinchang, Tianshui, Wuwei, Zhangye, Pingliang, Jiuquan, Qingyang, Dingxi, Longnan, Guyuan, Urumqi, and Karamay | Beijing, Tianjin, Shijiazhuang, Tangshan, Qinhuangdao, Baoding, Zhangjiakou, Chengde, Cangzhou, Langfang, Taiyuan, Yangquan, Jinzhong, Shenyang, Dalian, Anshan, Fushun, Benxi, Dandong, Jinzhou, Yingkou, Fuxin, Liaoyang, Panjin, Tieling, Huludao, Changchun, Jilin, Songyuan, Harbin, Qiqihar, Daqing, Shanghai, Nanjing, Wuxi, Changzhou, Suzhou, Nantong, Yangzhou, Zhenjiang, Taizhou (Jiangsu), Hangzhou, Ningbo, Jiaxing, Huzhou, Shaoxing, Zhoushan, Taizhou (Zhejiang), Hefei, Wuhu, Bengbu, Huainan, Ma'anshan, Tongling, Anqing, Chuzhou, Lu’an, Chizhou, Fuzhou (Fujian), Xiamen, Putian, Quanzhou, Zhangzhou, Ningde, Nanchang, Jingdezhen, Jiujiang, Yingtan, Shangrao, Jinan, Qingdao, Zibo, Dongying, Yantai, Weifang, Weihai, Rizhao, Zhengzhou, Kaifeng, Luoyang, Pingdingshan, Xinxiang, Jiaozuo, Xuchang, Luohe, Wuhan, Huangshi, Ezhou, Xiaogan, Huanggang, Xianning, Suizhou, Changsha, Zhuzhou, Xiangtan, Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Zhuhai, Foshan, Jiangmen, Zhaoqing, Huizhou, Dongguan, Zhongshan, Nanning, Beihai, Fangchenggang, Qinzhou, Chongqing, Chengdu, Zigong, Luzhou, Deyang, Mianyang, Guangyuan, Suining, Neijiang, Leshan, Nanchong, Meishan, Yibin, Guang’an, Dazhou, Ya’an, Bazhong, Ziyang, Guiyang, Zunyi, Anshun, Kunming, Qujing, Yuxi, Xi’an, Tongchuan, Baoji, Xianyang, Weinan, Lanzhou, Baiyin, Xining, Yinchuan, Shizuishan, and Wuzhong |
| [1] | Ali S., Kartal M.T., Ullah S., 2025. Pathways to environmental sustainability: The asymmetric effects of green technology innovation, policy stringency, and industrialization in the United States. Journal of Cleaner Production. 502, 145376, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145376. |
| [2] | Amin A., Bte Mohamed Yusoff N.Y., Peng S., et al., 2025. Driving sustainable development: The impact of energy transition, eco-innovation, mineral resources, and green growth on carbon emissions. Renewable Energy. 238, 121879, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2024.121879. |
| [3] |
Azam M., Rehman Z.U., Ibrahim Y., 2022. Causal nexus in industrialization, urbanization, trade openness, and carbon emissions: empirical evidence from OPEC economies. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 24(12), 13990-14010.
doi: 10.1007/s10668-021-02019-2 |
| [4] |
Barnett M., 2023. Climate change and uncertainty: An asset pricing perspective. Management Science. 69(12), 7562-7584.
doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2022.4635 |
| [5] | Behera P., Sethi L., Sethi N., et al., 2024. Balancing India’s energy trilemma: Assessing the role of renewable energy and green technology innovation for sustainable development. Energy. 308, 132842, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.132842. |
| [6] |
Bhat M.A., Abdelwahed., 2026. Unveiling the drivers of green innovation and their impact on sustainability performance: the mediating role of circular economy practices. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. 75(2), 565-588.
doi: 10.1108/IJPPM |
| [7] | Binsaeed R.H., Khan Z., Dogan E., et al., 2025. The role of energy efficiency, renewable resources, green innovation, and fiscal decentralization in sustainable development: Evidence from OECD countries. Utilities Policy. 95, 101915, doi: 10.1016/j.jup.101915. |
| [8] | Chai J., Tian L., Jia R., 2023. New energy demonstration city, spatial spillover and carbon emission efficiency: Evidence from China’s quasi-natural experiment. Energy Policy. 173, 113389, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113389. |
| [9] | Che S., Tao M., Silva E., 2024. Financial misallocation and green innovation efficiency: China’s firm-level evidence. Energy Economics. 136, 107697, doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107697. |
| [10] | Chen S., Yang Q., 2024. Renewable energy technology innovation and urban green economy efficiency. Journal of Environmental Management. 353, 120130, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120130. |
| [11] | Cui H.Y., Cao Y.Q., 2024. Low-carbon city construction, spatial spillovers and greenhouse gas emission performance: Evidence from Chinese cities. Journal of Environmental Management. 355, 120405, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120405. |
| [12] | Dai H.W., Liu Y.W., Li H.Y., et al., 2024. Depth and width of collaborative innovation networks and high-quality development. Sustainability. 16(14), 5909, doi: 10.3390/su16145909. |
| [13] | Ding Y.Y., Bi C.F., Sun P.P., 2025. Low carbon constraints, innovation driven and carbon neutral technological innovation: empirical evidence based on multiple policy combinations. Scientific Report. 22919, doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06207-2. |
| [14] | Dong Z., Xu H.D., Zhang Z.F., et al., 2022. Whether green finance improves green innovation of listed companies—evidence from China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 19(17), 10882, doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710882. |
| [15] |
Du M.Z., Antunes J., Wanke P., et al., 2022. Ecological efficiency assessment under the construction of low-carbon city: A perspective of green technology innovation. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 65(9), 1727-1752.
doi: 10.1080/09640568.2021.1945552 |
| [16] | Fang C.L., Bao C., Ma H.T., 2016. China Urban Agglomeration Development Report. Beijing: Science Press (in Chinese). |
| [17] | Faseyi C.A., Miyittah M.K., Yafetto L., 2023. Assessment of environmental degradation in two coastal communities of Ghana using Driver Pressure State Impact Response (DPSIR) framework. Journal of Environmental Management. 342, 118224, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118224. |
| [18] | Feng C.Y., Yang X.D., Afshan S., et al., 2023. Can renewable energy technology innovation promote mineral resources’ green utilization efficiency? Novel insights from regional development inequality. Resources Policy. 82, 103449, doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103449. |
| [19] | Gao X., Zhang A.L, Sun Z.L, 2020. How regional economic integration influence on urban land use efficiency? A case study of Wuhan metropolitan area. Land Use Policy. 90, 104329, doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104329. |
| [20] | Gong Q.X., 2024. Green transformation paths of resource-based cities in China from the configuration perspective. Regional Sustainability. 5(3), 100158, doi: 10.1016/j.regsus.2024.100158. |
| [21] | Gu Y.X., Cai S.K., 2025. Research on the impact of polycentric city network on economic growth in the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration. Sustainability. 17(7), 3267, doi: 10.3390/su17073267. |
| [22] | Guo W., Yang B., Ji J., et al., 2023. Abundance of natural resources, government scale and green economic growth: An empirical study on urban resource curse. Resources Policy. 87, 104303, doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104303. |
| [23] | Hao Z., Ye D., Hui W., et al., 2022. An empirical analysis of tourism eco-efficiency in ecological protection priority areas based on the DPSIR-SBM model: A case study of the Yellow River Basin, China. Ecological Informatics. 70, 101720, doi: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2022.101720. |
| [24] | Jiang H., Sun T.P., 2024. Unravelling the impact pathways of green innovation and environmental regulation on China’s green development efficiency goals: Direct and spillover effects. Ecological Indicators. 168, 112713, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112713. |
| [25] | Jiang Z.J., Lyu P.J., Ye L., et al., 2020. Green innovation transformation, economic sustainability and energy consumption during China’s new normal stage. Journal of Cleaner Production. 273, 123044, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123044. |
| [26] | Jiao J.L., Chen C.X., Bai Y., 2020. Is green technology vertical spillovers more significant in mitigating carbon intensity? Evidence from Chinese industries. Journal of Cleaner Production. 257, 120354, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120354. |
| [27] | Khan U.S., Cui Y., Khan A.A., et al., 2021. Tracking sustainable development efficiency with human-environmental system relationship: An application of DPSIR and super efficiency SBM model. Science of The Total Environment. 783, 146959, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146959. |
| [28] | Li G.Q., Xue Q., Qin J.H., 2022. Environmental information disclosure and green technology innovation: Empirical evidence from China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 176, 121453, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121453. |
| [29] | Li H., Du G.J., Qamri G.M., et al., 2024a. Green innovation and natural resource efficiency: The role of environmental regulations and resource endowment in Chinese cities. Journal of Environmental Management. 370, 122338, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122338. |
| [30] |
Li W.W., Yi P.T., Yu H.D., et al., 2023. Assessment on sustainable development of three major urban agglomerations in China based on sustainability‐differentiation‐combined weighting method. Sustainable Development. 31(4), 2678-2693.
doi: 10.1002/sd.v31.4 |
| [31] | Li Y., Yaacob M.H., Xie T., 2024b. Effects of China’s low carbon pilot city policy on corporate green innovation: Considering the mediating role of public environmental concern. Finance Research Letters. 65, 105641, doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2024.105641. |
| [32] | Li Z.C., Song Z.Y., 2025. Green finance reform and innovation pilot zones: A catalyst for green development efficiency in Chinese cities. Journal of Cleaner Production. 525, 146576, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.146576. |
| [33] | Li Z.Y., Hu B.Q., Bao Y.F., et al., 2025. Supply chain digitalization, green technology innovation and corporate energy efficiency. Energy Economics. 142, 108153, doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108153. |
| [34] | Liao Y., Qiu X.D., Wu A.N., et al., 2022. Assessing the impact of green innovation on corporate sustainable development. Frontiers in Energy Research. 9, 800848, doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2021.800848. |
| [35] | Liu S.Y., Wu Z.Y., Wang M., et al., 2025a. Can low-carbon city pilot policies promote green total factor energy efficiency in China? Sustainability. 17, 8516, doi: 10.3390/su17188516. |
| [36] | Liu Y., Ho T.C.F, Omar R., et al., 2025b. Green entrepreneurial leadership and AI-driven green process innovation: Advancing environmental sustainability in the Traditional Chinese Medicine industry. Journal of Environmental Management. 375, 124438, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124438. |
| [37] | Liu Y.B., Deng W.F., Wen H.W., et al., 2024. Promoting green technology innovation through policy synergy: Evidence from the dual pilot policy of low-carbon city and innovative city. Economic Analysis and Policy. 84, 957-977. |
| [38] | Lu C.H., Zhao P.T., Lin X.Q., 2023. Does green technology innovation contribute to energy efficiency improvement: Empirical evidence from Chinese cities. Energy Reports. 9(S8), 462-473. |
| [39] | Ma Q.F., Jia P., Kuang H.B., 2022. The impact of technological innovation on transport carbon emission efficiency in China: Spillover effect or siphon effect. Frontiers in Public Health. 10, 1028501, doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1028501. |
| [40] | Ma X.B., Sun B., Hou G.L., et al., 2021. Evaluation and spatial effects of tourism ecological security in the Yangtze River Delta. Ecological Indicators. 131, 108190, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108190. |
| [41] | Maftoon A.S., Afzal K., Razzaq A., 2026. Green innovations and clean energy: a regional exploration of their dual impact on global ecological sustainability. Energy Storage and Saving. 5(2), 100139, doi: 10.1016/j.enss.2025.05.011 |
| [42] | National Bureau of Statistics, Urban Social and Economic Survey Division, 2004-2022. China Urban Statistical Yearbook (2005-2023). Beijing: China Statistics Press (in Chinese). |
| [43] | Niu Z.Y., Yan C.X., Tan F.F., 2024. Green innovation and eco-efficiency: Interaction between society and environment of sustainable development demonstration belt in China. Environmental Technology & Innovation. 34, 103620, doi: 10.1016/j.eti.2024.103620. |
| [44] |
Padilla-Lozano C.P., Collazzo P., 2022. Corporate social responsibility, green innovation and competitiveness-causality in manufacturing. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal. 32(7), 21-39.
doi: 10.1108/CR-12-2020-0160 |
| [45] | Peng W.B., Yin Y., Kuang C.G., et al., 2021. Spatial spillover effect of green innovation on economic development quality in China: Evidence from a panel data of 270 prefecture-level and above cities. Sustainable Cities and Society. 69, 120863, doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102863. |
| [46] | Raihan A., Pavel M.I., Muhtasim D.A., et al., 2023. The role of renewable energy use, technological innovation, and forest cover toward green development: evidence from Indonesia. Innovation and Green Development. 2(1), 100035, doi: 10.1016/j.igd.2023.100035. |
| [47] | Senhaji N., Benali M., Bensouda M., 2025. Enhancing energy efficiency through green innovation: A literature review. Procedia Computer Science. 265, 442-448. |
| [48] | Shang H., Jiang L., Pan X., et al., 2022. Green technology innovation spillover effect and urban eco-efficiency convergence: Evidence from Chinese cities. Energy Economics. 114, 106307, doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106307. |
| [49] | Song A., Rasool Z., Nazar R., et al., 2024. Towards a greener future: How green technology innovation and energy efficiency are transforming sustainability. Energy. 290, 129891, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.129891. |
| [50] | Sun Y.P., Gao P.P., Tian W.J., et al., 2023. Green innovation for resource efficiency and sustainability: Empirical analysis and policy. Resources Policy. 81, 103369, doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103369. |
| [51] | Tan F.F., Gong C.Y., Niu Z.Y., 2022a. How does regional integration development affect green innovation? Evidence from China’s major urban agglomerations. Journal of Cleaner Production. 379, 134613, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134613. |
| [52] |
Tan F.F., Yang L.X., Lu Z.H., et al., 2022b. Impact of urban innovation on urban green development in China’s Yangtze River Economic Belt: Perspectives of scale and network. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 29(49), 73878-73895.
doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-21042-y |
| [53] | Tang W.G., Mai L.Q., Li M.F., 2023. Green innovation and resource efficiency to meet net-zero emission. Resources Policy. 86, 104231, doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104231. |
| [54] | Van Trung H., Fei F., Mohanty P.P., et al., 2025. Green innovations and its dual impact on economic growth and environmental sustainability: Evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Environmental Management. 395, 127751, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.127751. |
| [55] | Wang H., Tan X.Y., Li M.Z., 2025a. Extreme climate attention and corporate energy innovation: Empirical evidence from China. Energy Economics. 148, 108681, doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108681. |
| [56] | Wang H.R., Cui H.R., Zhao Q.Z., 2020. Effect of green technology innovation on green total factor productivity in China: Evidence from spatial Durbin model analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production. 15, 125624, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125624. |
| [57] |
Wang S., Sun C.Z., Li X., et al., 2016. Sustainable development in China’s coastal area: based on the driver-pressure-state-welfare-response framework and the data envelopment analysis model. Sustainability. 8(9), 958-977.
doi: 10.3390/su8090958 |
| [58] | Wang S.D., Zhang X.Y., Wu T.X., et al., 2019. The evolution of landscape ecological security in Beijing under the influence of different policies in recent decades. Science of The Total Environment. 646, 49-57. |
| [59] |
Wang Y., Yang Y., 2021. Analyzing the green innovation practices based on sustainability performance indicators: A Chinese manufacturing industry case. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 28(1), 1181-1203.
doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10531-7 |
| [60] | Wang Y., Liu Y.J., Chen X.H., 2025b. Green technology innovation, ESG ratings and corporate sustainable performance: Empirical evidence from listed semiconductor companies in China. International Review of Economics & Finance. 99, 104061, doi: 10.1016/j.iref.2025.104061. |
| [61] | Wu L., Zhu C.G., Wang G.N., 2024. The impact of green innovation resilience on energy efficiency: A perspective based on the development of the digital economy. Journal of Environmental Management. 355, 120424, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120424. |
| [62] | Wu Q., Cao Y., Fang X.Q., et al., 2022. A systematic coupling analysis framework and multi-stage interaction mechanism between urban land use efficiency and ecological carrying capacity. Science of The Total Environment. 853, 158444, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158444. |
| [63] | Xi S.W., Yan K.J., Zhang B., et al., 2026. Revitalizing oil-gas resource-based cities: Unveiling spatial heterogeneity and life cycle dynamics of sustainable development capacity. Habitat International. 167, 103649, doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2025.103649. |
| [64] | Xu J.Q., Zhao J.F., She S.X., et al., 2022. Green growth, natural resources and sustainable development: Evidence from BRICS economies. Resources Policy. 79, 103032, doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103032. |
| [65] | Xu R.Y., Wang K.L., Miao Z., 2024a. The impact of digital technology innovation on green total-factor energy efficiency in China: Does economic development matter? Energy Policy. 194, 114342, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114342. |
| [66] | Xu T., Hordofa T.T., Kaur P., et al., 2024b. Natural resources management efficiency: The role of green innovation for digital government. Resources Policy. 95, 105119, doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105119. |
| [67] | Yan Y.A., Bao C., 2026. Assessing green total factor productivity considering spatial scale effects and technological gaps: A meta-frontier analysis of urban agglomerations in China. Applied Geography. 191, 104019, doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2026.104019. |
| [68] | Yang G.M., Gui Q.Q., Liu J.Y., et al., 2023. Spatial-temporal evolution and driving factors of ecological security in China based on DPSIR-DEA model: A case study of the three gorges reservoir area. Ecological Indicators. 154, 110777, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110777. |
| [69] |
Yang Y.P., Wu D., Xu M., et al., 2022. Capital misallocation, technological innovation, and green development efficiency: Empirical analysis based on China provincial panel data. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 29(43), 65535-65548.
doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20364-1 |
| [70] | Yu H.Y., Wang J.C., Hou J., et al., 2023. The effect of economic growth pressure on green technology innovation: Do environmental regulation, government support, and financial development matter? Journal of Environmental Management. 330, 117172, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117172. |
| [71] | Zhang D., Zheng M.B., Feng G.F., et al., 2022a. Does an environmental policy bring to green innovation in renewable energy? Renewable Energy. 195, 1113-1124. |
| [72] | Zhang J.F., Ge K.X., Wang L., 2025. Beyond patent counts: a comprehensive assessment of environmental protection tax effects on innovation quality and quantity. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 13, 1543949, doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2025.1543949. |
| [73] | Zhang J.X., Chang Y., Zhang L.X., et al., 2018. Do technological innovations promote urban green development? —A spatial econometric analysis of 105 cities in China. Journal of Cleaner Production. 182, 395-403. |
| [74] | Zhang M.F., Hong Y.X., Zhu B.Z., 2022b. Does national innovative city pilot policy promote green technology progress? Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production. 363, 132461, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132461. |
| [75] | Zhang X., Xu F., 2023. Environmental regulation and spatial spillover effect of green technology innovation: An empirical study on the spatial Durbin model. Sustainability. 15(19), 14133, doi: 10.3390/su151914133. |
| [76] | Zhang Y.P., Yang Y.C., 2025. Can governmental innovation subsidies promote firm innovative economic efficiency? Evidence from China. International Review of Financial Analysis. 106, 104473, doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104473. |
| [77] | Zhang Z.H., Li P.X., Wang X.Y., et al., 2024. New energy policy and new quality productive forces: A quasi-natural experiment based on demonstration cities. Economic Analysis and Policy. 84, 1670-1688. |
| [78] | Zhao K., Zhang Y., Hamadou K.Y., 2025. Unveiling the pathways: How technological innovation shapes green economic efficiency. International Review of Economics & Finance. 103, 104574, doi: 10.1016/j.iref.2025.104574. |
| [79] | Zhao Q.Y., Jiang M., Zhao Z.X., et al., 2024. The impact of green innovation on carbon reduction efficiency in China: Evidence from machine learning validation. Energy Economics. 133, 107525, doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107525. |
| [80] |
Zhou L., Zhou C.H., Che L., et al., 2020. Spatio-temporal evolution and influencing factors of urban green development efficiency in China. Journal of Geographical Sciences. 30(5), 724-742.
doi: 10.1007/s11442-020-1752-5 |
| [81] | Zhu C.H., Yu J.Y., 2025. Does inclusive finance enhance green finance’s impact on SMEs’ energy efficiency: The perspective of green innovation. Finance Research Letters. 85, 108258, doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2025.108258. |
| No related articles found! |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
REGSUS Wechat
新公网安备 65010402001202号