Full Length Article

Spatial differentiation and risk zonation of debris flow hazards in Tajikistan

  • JIA Wenjun ,
  • CHEN Ningsheng ,
  • XUE Yang ,
  • WANG Zhihan ,
  • WEN Tao ,
  • GUO Ru ,
  • Safaralizoda NOSIR ,
  • Aminjon GULAKHMADOV
Expand
  • aInternational Cooperation Center for Mountain Multi-Disasters Prevention and Engineering Safety, School of Geosciences, Yangtze University, Wuhan, 430100, China
    bSchool of Geosciences, Yangtze University, Wuhan, 430100, China
    cInstitute of Geology, Earthquake-Resistant Construction and Seismology, National Academy of Sciences of Tajikistan, Dushanbe, 734000, Tajikistan
    dInstitute of Water Problems, Hydropower and Ecology of the National Academy of Sciences of Tajikistan, Dushanbe, 734000, Tajikistan
* E-mail address: chennsh@yangtzeu.edu.cn (CHEN Ningsheng).

Received date: 2025-10-09

  Revised date: 2025-12-22

  Accepted date: 2026-01-05

  Online published: 2026-01-21

Abstract

Debris flow events are frequent in Tajikistan, yet comprehensive investigations at the regional scale are limited. This study integrates remote sensing, Geographic Information System, and machine learning techniques to evaluate debris flow susceptibility and associated hazards across Tajikistan. A dataset comprising 405 documented debris flow points and 14 influencing factors, encompassing geological, climatic-hydrological, and anthropogenic variables, was established. Three machine learning algorithms—Random Forest, Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Multi-layer Perceptron—were applied to generate susceptibility maps and delineate debris flow risk zones. The results indicate that the areas of higher and high susceptibility accounted for 20.43% and 4.41% of the national area, respectively, and were predominantly concentrated along the Zeravshan and Vakhsh river basins. Among the evaluated models, SVM model demonstrated the highest predictive performance. Beyond conventional topographic and environmental controls, drought conditions were identified as a critical factor influencing debris flow occurrence within the arid and semi-arid mountainous regions of Tajikistan. These findings provide a scientific basis for regional debris flow risk management and disaster mitigation planning, and offer practical guidance for selecting conditioning factors in machine-learning-based susceptibility assessments in other dry mountainous environments.

Cite this article

JIA Wenjun , CHEN Ningsheng , XUE Yang , WANG Zhihan , WEN Tao , GUO Ru , Safaralizoda NOSIR , Aminjon GULAKHMADOV . Spatial differentiation and risk zonation of debris flow hazards in Tajikistan[J]. Regional Sustainability, 2026 , 7(1) : 100299 . DOI: 10.1016/j.regsus.2026.100299

References

[1] Academy of Sciences of the Tajik SSR (Soviet Socialist Republic), 1968. Atlas of the Tajik Soviet Socialist Republic. Dushanbe: Main Administration of Geodesy and Cartography (GUGK) (in Russian).
[2] Angillieri M.Y.E., 2020. Debris flow susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio and seed cells, in a portion of a mountain international route, dry Central Andes of Argentina. CATENA. 189, 104504, doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2020.104504.
[3] Baggio T., Martini M., Bettella F., et al., 2024. Debris flow and debris flood hazard assessment in mountain catchments. CATENA. 245, 108338, doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2024.108338.
[4] Bregoli F., Medina V., Chevalier G., et al., 2015. Debris-flow susceptibility assessment at regional scale: Validation on an alpine environment. Landslides. 12, 437-454.
[5] Carrara A., Crosta G., Frattini P., 2008. Comparing models of debris-flow susceptibility in the alpine environment. Geomorphology. 94(3-4), 353-378.
[6] Chen H.Y., Ruan H.C., Chen J.G., et al., 2022. Review of investigations on hazard chains triggered by river-blocking debris flows and dam-break floods. Frontiers in Earth Science. 10, 83004, doi: 10.3389/feart.2022.830044.
[7] Chen N.S., Zhang Y., Tian S.F., et al., 2020a. Effectiveness analysis of the prediction of regional debris flow susceptibility in post-earthquake and drought site. Journal of Mountain Science. 17(2), 329-339.
[8] Chen X.Z., Chen H., You Y., et al., 2015. Susceptibility assessment of debris flows using the analytic hierarchy process method - A case study in Subao river valley, China. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. 7(4), 404-410.
[9] Chen Y., Qin S.W., Qiao S.S., et al., 2020b. Spatial predictions of debris flow susceptibility mapping using convolutional neural networks in Jilin Province, China. Water. 12(8), 2079, doi: 10.3390/w12082079.
[10] Demler O.V., Pencina M.J., D’Agostino Sr. R.B., et al., 2012. Misuse of DeLong test to compare AUCs for nested models. Statistics in Medicine. 31(23), 2577-2587.
[11] Dikshit A., Pradhan B., Alamri A.M., 2021. Pathways and challenges of the application of artificial intelligence to geohazards modelling. Gondwana Research. 100, 290-301.
[12] Erokhin S.A., Zaginaev V.V., Meleshko A.A., et al., 2018. Debris flows triggered from non-stationary glacier lake outbursts: the case of the Teztor Lake complex (Northern Tian Shan, Kyrgyzstan). Landslides. 15(1), 83-98.
[13] Handwerger A.L., Huang M.H., Fielding E.J., et al., 2019. A shift from drought to extreme rainfall drives a stable landslide to catastrophic failure. Scientific Reports. 9(1), 1569, doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-38300-0.
[14] Horton P., Jaboyedoff M., Rudaz B., et al., 2013. Flow-R, a model for susceptibility mapping of debris flows and other gravitational hazards at a regional scale. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences. 13(4), 869-885.
[15] Hu G.S., Shang Y.J., Zeng Q.L., et al., 2017. The emergency scientific investigation of catastrophic debris flow in Yecheng County of Xinjiang on July 6th, 2016. Mountain Research. 35(1), 112-116.
[16] Hu G.S., Zhao C.Y., Chen N.S., et al., 2019. Characteristics, mechanisms and prevention modes of debris flows in an arid seismically active region along the Sichuan-Tibet railway route, China: a case study of the Basu-Ranwu section, southeastern Tibet. Environmental Earth Sciences. 78(18), 564, doi: 10.1007/s12665-019-8554-z.
[17] Huang F.M., Pan L.H., Fan X.M., et al., 2022a. The uncertainty of landslide susceptibility prediction modeling: suitability of linear conditioning factors. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment. 81, 182, doi: 10.1007/s10064-022-02672-5.
[18] Huang H., Wang Y.S., Li Y.M., et al., 2022b. Debris-flow susceptibility assessment in China: A comparison between traditional statistical and machine learning methods. Remote Sensing. 14(18), 4475, doi: 10.3390/rs14184475.
[19] Ilia I., Tsangaratos P., 2016. Applying weight of evidence method and sensitivity analysis to produce a landslide susceptibility map. Landslides. 13(2), 379-397.
[20] Janssen A., Pauls T., 2003. How do bootstrap and permutation tests work? The Annals of Statistics. 31(3), 768-806.
[21] Kappes M.S., Malet J.P., Rema?tre A., et al., 2011. Assessment of debris-flow susceptibility at medium-scale in the Barcelonnette Basin, France. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences. 11(2), 627-641.
[22] Leinss S., Bernardini E., Jacquemart M., et al., 2021. Glacier detachments and rock-ice avalanches in the Petra Pervogo range, Tajikistan (1973-2019). Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences. 21(5), 1409-1429.
[23] Li C.J., Hu Y.X., Fan G., et al., 2024. Exploring debris flow deposit morphology in river valleys: Insights from physical modeling experiments. Engineering Geology. 332, 107465, doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2024.107465.
[24] Li M.Y., Cao S., Zhu Z.C., et al., 2023. Spatiotemporally Consistent Global Dataset of the GIMMS Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (PKU GIMMS NDVI) from 1982 to 2022 (V1.2). [2025-08-30]. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8253971.
[25] Li W.C., Li H.J., Dai F.C., et al., 2012. Discrete element modeling of a rainfall-induced flowslide. Engineering Geology. 149-150, 22-34.
[26] Lin Y., Guo Z.H., Meng Q.B., et al., 2025. Prediction of peak strength under triaxial compression for sandstone based on ABC-SVM algorithm. Expert Systems with Applications. 264, 125923, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125923.
[27] Liu M., Zhang Y., Tian S.F., et al., 2020. Effects of loose deposits on debris flow processes in the Aizi Valley, southwest China. Journal of Mountain Science. 17(1), 156-172.
[28] Ma T.X., Lin Y., Zhou X.B., et al., 2022. Grading evaluation of goaf stability based on entropy and normal cloud model. Advances in Civil Engineering. 2022(1), 9600909, doi: 10.1155/2022/9600909.
[29] Meng D.B., Yang S.Y., De Jesus A.M.P., et al., 2023. A novel hybrid adaptive Kriging and water cycle algorithm for reliability-based design and optimization strategy: Application in offshore wind turbine monopile. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. 412, 116083, doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2023.116083.
[30] Meng D.B., Yang S.Y., Yang H.F., et al., 2024. Intelligent-inspired framework for fatigue reliability evaluation of offshore wind turbine support structures under hybrid uncertainty. Ocean Engineering. 307, 118213, doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.118213.
[31] Meng D.B., Zhu S.P., 2024. Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of Complex Structures Under Uncertainty. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
[32] Naef D., Rickenmann D., Rutschmann P., et al., 2006. Comparison of flow resistance relations for debris flows using a one-dimensional finite element simulation model. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences. 6(1), 155-165.
[33] Nyman P., Rutherfurd I.D., Lane P.N.J., et al., 2019. Debris flows in southeast Australia linked to drought, wildfire, and the El Ni?o-Southern Oscillation. Geology. 47(5), 491-494.
[34] Podgórski J., P?tlicki M., Fernández A., et al., 2023. Evaluating the impact of the Central Chile mega drought on debris cover, broadband albedo, and surface drainage system of a dry Andes glacier. Science of The Total Environment. 905, 166907, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166907.
[35] Ren D.D., Leslie L.M., 2020. Climate warming enhancement of catastrophic southern California debris flows. Scientific Reports. 10(1), 10507, doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-67511-7.
[36] Rogelis M.C., Werner M., 2014. Regional debris flow susceptibility analysis in mountainous peri-urban areas through morphometric and land cover indicators. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences. 14(11), 3043-3064.
[37] Safarov M., Kang S.C., Fazylov A., et al., 2025. Mapping the territories of the mountain-foothill zone of Tajikistan exposed to mudflows. Journal of Mountain Science. 22(1), 16-30.
[38] Shahgedanova M., Saidaliyeva Z., Mussina A., et al., 2024. Debris flows in the northern Tien Shan, Central Asia: regional database, meteorological triggers, and trends. npj Natural Hazards. 1, 49, doi: 10.1038/s44304-024-00050-7.
[39] Shen L.X., Ma T.X., Chen H., et al., 2025. A new CNN-GRU deep learning framework optimized by CHIO for precise prediction of debris flow velocity. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment. 39(6), 2351-2371.
[40] Shen W., Li T.L., Li P., et al., 2018. A modified finite difference model for the modeling of flowslides. Landslides. 15(8), 1577-1593.
[41] Sorg A., Bolch T., Stoffel M., et al., 2012. Climate change impacts on glaciers and runoff in Tien Shan (Central Asia). Nature Climate Change. 2, 725-731.
[42] Wang Y.F., Ma T.X., Shen L.X., et al., 2025. Prediction of thermal conductivity of natural rock materials using LLE-transformer-lightGBM model for geothermal energy applications. Energy Reports. 13, 2516-2530.
[43] Wei Z.L., Shang Y.Q., Liang Q.H., et al., 2024. A coupled hydrological and hydrodynamic modeling approach for estimating rainfall thresholds of debris-flow occurrence. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences. 24(10), 3357-3379.
[44] Wilford D.J., Sakals M.E., Innes J.L., et al., 2004. Recognition of debris flow, debris flood and flood hazard through watershed morphometrics. Landslides. 1(1), 61-66.
[45] Xie S.J., Lin H., Duan H.Y., et al., 2025a. A novel triaxial strength criterion for rocks based on the ultimate strength and its application. Geoenergy Science and Engineering. 246, 213590, doi: 10.1016/j.geoen.2024.213590.
[46] Xie S.J., Lin H., Ma T.X., et al., 2025b. Prediction of joint roughness coefficient via hybrid machine learning model combined with principal components analysis. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. 17(4), 2291-2306.
[47] Xinhua News Agency, 2021. Eight People Died in a Debris Flow in Tajikistan. [2025-07-15]. https://www.xinhuanet.com/world/2021-05/12/c_1127438295.htm?baike (in Chinese).
[48] Xu W.B., Yu W.J., Jing S.C., et al., 2013. Debris flow susceptibility assessment by GIS and information value model in a large-scale region, Sichuan Province (China). Natural Hazards. 65(3), 1379-1392.
[49] Yang C., Wang J., Zhang G.T., 2024. A novel framework for debris flow susceptibility assessment considering the uncertainty of sample selection. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk. 15(1), 2425732, doi: 10.1080/19475705.2024.2425732.
[50] Y?lmaz K., Din?er A.E., Kalpakc? V., et al., 2023. Debris flow modelling and hazard assessment for a glacier area: a case study in Barsem Tajikistan. Natural Hazards. 115(3), 2577-2601.
[51] Zhang Y.H., Ge T.T., Tian W., et al., 2019. Debris flow susceptibility mapping using machine-learning techniques in Shigatse area, China. Remote Sensing. 11(23), 2801, doi: 10.3390/rs11232801.
[52] Zhang Y.W., Chen J.P., Wang Q., et al., 2022. Geographic information system models with fuzzy logic for susceptibility maps of debris flow using multiple types of parameters: a case study in Pinggu District of Beijing, China. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences. 22(7), 2239-2255.
[53] Zhao H.J., Wei A.H., Ma F.S., et al., 2024. Comparison of debris flow susceptibility assessment methods: support vector machine, particle swarm optimization, and feature selection techniques. Journal of Mountain Science. 21(2), 397-412.
[54] Zhao Y., Meng X.M., Qi T.J., et al., 2021. Modeling the spatial distribution of debris flows and analysis of the controlling factors: A machine learning approach. Remote Sensing. 13(23), 4813, doi: 10.3390/rs13234813.
[55] Zhong Z., Chen N.S., Hu G.S., et al., 2021. Aggravation of debris flow disaster by extreme climate and engineering: a case study of the Tongzilin Gully, Southwestern Sichuan Province, China. Natural Hazards. 109(1), 237-253.
[56] Zhou W.T., Zou Q., Chen S.Y., et al., 2024. Extreme climate and human activities contribute to low-frequency, large-scale catastrophic debris flow: a case study in the Heishui Gully. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk. 15(1), 2316719, doi: 10.1080/19475705.2024.2316719.
Outlines

/