Full Length Article

Preserving environmental quality of ecotourism sites through community participation in Purulia District of West Bengal, India

  • Piyall CHATTERJEE ,
  • Soumyendra Kishore DATTA
Expand
  • Department of Economics the University of Burdwan, West Bengal, 734013, India
* E-mail address: piyalichatterjee455@gmail.com (Piyali CHATTERJEE).

Received date: 2023-04-27

  Revised date: 2024-02-11

  Accepted date: 2024-08-22

  Online published: 2024-09-25

Abstract

The importance of valuing environmental resources, especially in ecotourism sites, has become increasingly important over the last two decades. Ecotourism is now considered as an important source of livelihood of local stakeholders in backward regions. Therefore, the preservation of ecotourism sites through community participation seems very important to maintain continued flow of tourists. This study aimed at recognizing the importance of community participation for the preservation of ecotourism sites. For this, this study executed a survey based on non-probability sampling in two ecotourism sites (Garpanchkot and Baranti) covering 100 respondents in Purulia District, West Bengal of India. The central issue of this study was to assess the tendency of community participation for the conservation of ecotourism sites and find the optimum condition for offering participatory labour time. This study showed that the participation of young people is high, and the majority of respondents are aware of the importance in protecting ecotourism sites. Because respondents were too poor to offer money, the contingent valuation method (CVM) was used to elicit their willingness to pay (WTP) participatory labour time for the conservation of ecotourism sites. Respondents’ age, income, education level, caste, and their perceived environmental quality had significant relationship with their WTP participatory labour time by applying the ordinary least square (OLS) model. It was found that the mean WTP participatory labour time of each respondent in a month is approximately 3.64 h. The significance of this study is that community participation can improve the sense of belonging, trust, and credibility of ecotourism sites, making them more appreciative of the value and protection of these sites.

Cite this article

Piyall CHATTERJEE , Soumyendra Kishore DATTA . Preserving environmental quality of ecotourism sites through community participation in Purulia District of West Bengal, India[J]. Regional Sustainability, 2024 , 5(3) : 100163 . DOI: 10.1016/j.regsus.2024.100163

References

[1] Abdeta D., 2022a. Households’ willingness to pay for forest conservation in Ethiopia: A review. J. For. Sci.-Prague. 68(11), 437-451.
[2] Abdeta D., 2022b. Willingness to pay for forest conservation in developing countries: A systematic literature review. Environ. Sustain. Indic. 100201, doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2023.e02551.
[3] Abdeta D., Ayana A.N., Bekele Y., 2023. Willingness to pay for forest conservation: Evidence from a contingent valuation survey analysis in Southwest Ethiopia. Global Ecology and Conservation. 46, e02551, doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2023.e02551.
[4] Al-Assaf A., Albalawneh A., Majdalawi M., et al., 2021. Local communities’ willingness to accept compensation for sustainable ecosystem management in Wadi Araba, South of Jordan. Sustainability. 13(9), 5190, doi: 10.3390/su13095190.
[5] Ali M.B., Quaddus M., Rabbanee F.K., et al., 2022. Community participation and quality of life in nature-based tourism: Exploring the antecedents and moderators. J. Hosp. Tour. Res. 46(3), 630-661.
[6] Andlib Z., Salcedo-Castro J., 2021. The impacts of tourism and governance on CO2 emissions in selected south Asian countries. Etikonomi. 20(2), 385-396.
[7] Apdohan J.R.D., Lopez S.O., Seronay R.A., 2021. Willingness to pay towards the conservation of ecotourism resources at Agusan Marsh Wildlife Sanctuary, Agusan del Sur, Philippines. Int. J. Conserv. Sci. 12(3), 1163-1170.
[8] Aseres S.A., Sira R.K., 2020. Estimating visitors’ willingness to pay for a conservation fund: sustainable financing approach in protected areas in Ethiopia. Heliyon. 6(8), e04500, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04500.
[9] Aslan A., Altinoz B., ?zsolak B., et al., 2021. The nexus between economic growth, tourism development, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions in Mediterranean countries. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 28, 3243-3252.
[10] Azam M., Alam M.M., Hafeez M.H., 2018. Effect of tourism on environmental pollution: Further evidence from Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand. J. Clean. Prod. 190,330-338.
[11] Baloch Q.B., Shah S.N., Iqbal N., et al., 2023. Impact of tourism development upon environmental sustainability: A suggested framework for sustainable ecotourism. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 30(3), 5917-5930.
[12] Berhanu D., 2023. Labor as a payment vehicle for the rangeland improvement: an application of contingent valuation method in Yabello District, Southern Ethiopia. Malaysian Journal of Sustainable Agriculture. 7(1), 25-31.
[13] Bharali A., 2012. A study on the demand for ecotourism using non-market valuation methods:the case study of Kaziranga National Park. PhD Dissertation. Silchar: Assam University.
[14] Bishop R.C., Boyle K.J., 2019. Reliability and validity in nonmarket valuation. Environ. Resour. Econ. 72(3), 559-582.
[15] Boman M., 2022. The sample median as an estimator of population mean true willingness to pay under valuation uncertainty: A synthesis and analysis of the literature. Appl. Econ. 54(55), 6393-6405.
[16] Byrd E.T., 2007. Stakeholders in sustainable tourism development and their roles: Applying stakeholder theory to sustainable tourism development. Tour. Rev. 62(2), 6-13.
[17] Chan J.K.L., Marzuki K.M., Mohtar T.M., 2021. Local community participation and responsible tourism practices in ecotourism destination: A case of Lower Kinabatangan, Sabah. Sustainability. 13(23), 13302, doi: 10.3390/su132313302.
[18] Chu X., Zhan J.Y., Wang C., et al., 2020. Households’ willingness to accept improved ecosystem services and influencing factors: application of contingent valuation method in Bashang Plateau, Hebei Province, China. J. Environ. Manage. 255, 1009925, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109925.
[19] Darda M.A., Bhuiyan M.A.H., 2022. A Structural Equation Model (SEM) for the socio-economic impacts of ecotourism development in Malaysia. PLoS One. 17(8), e0273294, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273294.
[20] Dharmadhikari S., 2024. Ecotourism Global Market Report 2024. [2023-01-11]. https://www.researchandmarkets.com/report/ecotourism?srsltid=AfmBOoq2y0XBQEkvfHUsOVELzYhN-SqUR2r-0wQ1nn0crJSLUztTScrA.
[21] Diamond P.A., Hausman J.A., 1994. Contingent valuation: Is some number better than no number? J. Econ. Perspect. 8(4), 45-64.
[22] Endalew B., Wondimagegnhu B.A., Tassie K., 2020. Willingness to pay for church forest conservation: A case study in northwestern Ethiopia. J. For. Sci. 66(3), 105-116.
[23] Eshun G., Tichaawa T.M., 2019. Reconsidering participation for local community well-being in ecotourism in Ghana. Geojournal of Tourism and Geosites. 27(4), 1184-1200.
[24] Gan J.E., 2021. Ecotourism and Malaysia’s Orang Asli: The social construction of indigeneity in community boundary-drawing. J. Ecotourism. 21(1), 54-70.
[25] Garrod B., 2003. Local participation in the planning and management of ecotourism: A revised model approach. J. Ecotour. 2(1), 33-53.
[26] Giriwati S.S.N., Lyati W., Hawa C.L., et al., 2019. Local community participation in ecotourism development: The case of Sumberwangi Hamlet Destination, East Java, Indonesia. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences. 5(1), 81-98.
[27] Gumede T.K., Nzama A.T., 2020. Enhancing community participation in ecotourism through a local community participation improvement model. African Journal of Hospitality Tourism and Leisure. 9(5), 1252-1272.
[28] Gunatilake H., Maddipati N., Sumeet P., 2012. Willingness to Pay for Good Quality, Uninterrupted Power Supply in Madhya Pradesh, India. [2023-03-11]. https://www.adb.org/publications/willingness-pay-good-quality-uninterrupted-power-supply-madhya-pradesh-india.
[29] Hamuna B., Rumahorbo B.T., Keiluhu H., 2018. Willingness to pay for existence value of mangrove ecosystem in Youtefa Bay, Jayapura, Indonesia. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism. 5(29), 907-915.
[30] Hanley N., Shogren J.F., White B., 1997. Environmental Economics in Theory and Practice. London: Macmillan, 391.
[31] Hasana U., Swain S.K., George B., 2022. Management of ecological resources for sustainable tourism: A systematic review on community participation in ecotourism literature. International Journal of Professional Business Review. 7(1), e0269. doi: 10.26668/businessreview/2022.v7i1.269.
[32] Hassan E.K.N.E., Shuib A., Kunasekaran P., et al., 2018. Local community participation in ecotourism development in Tasik Kenyir, Malaysia. World Applied Sciences Journal. 36(1), 85-92.
[33] Hoang T.T.H., Van Rompaey A., Meyfroidt P., et al., 2020. Impact of tourism development on the local livelihoods and land cover change in the Northern Vietnamese highlands. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 22, 1371-1395.
[34] Kabil M., Ali M.A., Marzouk A., et al., 2024. Gender perspectives in tourism studies: A comparative bibliometric analysis in the MENA region. Tourism Planning & Development. 21(3), 276-298.
[35] Khan M.S., Bhagwat S.A., 2010. Protected areas: A resource or constraint for local people? Moun. Res. Develop. 30(1), 14-24.
[36] Li H., Yang X.H., Zhang X., et al., 2018. Estimation of rural households’ willingness to accept two PES programs and their service valuation in the Miyun Reservoir Catchment, China. Sustainability. 10(1), 170, doi: 10.3390/su10010170.
[37] Ma B., Wen Y.L., 2019. Community participation and preferences regarding conservation and development policies in China’s giant panda nature reserves. Sustainability. 11(18), 4852, doi: 10.3390/su11184852.
[38] McFadden D., Train K., 2017. Stated preference methods and their applicability to environmental use and non-use valuations. In: McFaddenD., TrainK., (eds.). Contingent Valuation of Environmental Goods:A Comprehensive Critique. Camberley: Edward Elgar Publishing, 153-187.
[39] Meginnis K., Hanley N., Mujumbusi L., et al., 2020. Non-monetary numeraires: Varying the payment vehicle in a choice experiment for health interventions in Uganda. Ecol. Econ. 170, 106569, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106569.
[40] Musa F., Fozi N.M., Hamdan D.D.M., 2020. Coastal communities’ willingness to pay for mangrove ecotourism at Marudu Bay, Sabah, Malaysia. J. Sustain. Sci. Manag. 15(4), 130-140.
[41] Palit S., Saren U.K.P.M., 2021. Perception of tourism on the socio-economic improvement of Purulia: A case study from the Ajyodha Hills, Purulia, West Bengal, India. Psychology and Education. 58(3), 3483-3496.
[42] Perni á., Barreiro-Hurlé J., Martinez-Paz J., 2021. Contingent valuation estimates for environmental goods: Validity and reliability. Ecol. Econ. 189, 107144, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107144.
[43] Pineda F., Padilla J., Granobles-Torres J.C., et al., 2023. Community preferences for participating in ecotourism: A case study in a coastal lagoon in Colombia. Environmental Challenges. 11, 100713, doi: 10.1016/j.envc.2023.100713.
[44] Piper S., 1998. Using contingent valuation and benefit transfer to evaluate water supply improvement benefits. J. Am. Water. Resour. Assoc. 34(2), 311-320.
[45] Schiappacasse I., Lavin F., Nahuelhual L., et al., 2013. Labor as welfare measure in contingent valuation: The value of a forest restoration project. Agricultural Science and Research. 40(1), 69-84
[46] Sethy M.K., Senapati A.K., 2023. Perceptions towards ecotourism practice and the willingness to pay: Evidence from Chilika coastal wetland ecosystem, Odisha. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks. 11(3), 497-513.
[47] Shaheen K., Zaman K., Batool R., et al., 2019. Dynamic linkages between tourism, energy, environment, and economic growth: Evidence from top 10 tourism-induced countries. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 26, 31273-31283.
[48] Stef?nica M., Butnaru G.I., 2016. Research on tourists’ perception of the relationship between tourism and environment. Procedia Economics and Finance. 20, 595-600.
[49] Subanti S., Hakim A.R., Irawan B.B., et al., 2017. Determinant of willingness to pay and economic value for tourism object using contingent valuation method: The case of Sangiran sites, Province of central Java, Indonesia. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism. 8(4), 867-874.
[50] Sun Y.P., Yesilada F., Andlib Z., et al., 2021. The role of eco-innovation and globalization towards carbon neutrality in the USA. J. Environ. Manag. 299, 113568, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113568.
[51] TIES The International Ecotourism Society, 1990. The Definition. [2023-01-11]. https://ecotourism.org/ties-overview/.
[52] Ting M., Min Q.W., Kun X., et al., 2021. Resident willingness to pay for ecotourism resources and associated factors in Sanjiangyuan National Park, China. Journal of Resources and Ecology. 12(5), 693-706.
[53] UNWTO World Tourism Organization of the United Nations, 2008. Tourism Highlights. Madrid: UNWTO.
[54] Upadhaya S., Tiwari S., Poudyal B., et al., 2022. Local people’s perception of the impacts and importance of ecotourism in Central Nepal. PLoS One. 17(5), e0268637, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268637.
[55] Uzulmez M., Ercan??tin A., Barakazi E., 2023. Environmental awareness, ecotourism awareness and ecotourism perception of tourist guides. Sustainability. 15(16), 12616, doi: 10.3390/su151612616.
[56] Vondolia G.K., Navrud S., 2019. Are non-monetary payment modes more uncertain for stated preference elicitation in developing countries? Journal of Choice Modeling. 30, 73-87.
[57] Wollie G., Adem M., Menelek D., et al., 2021. Households willingness to pay for the development of community based tourism around Alelo Bad hot spring water: The Ethiopian case study. Journal of Hospitality Management and Tourism. 12(2), 18-28.
Outlines

/