Review Article

A cross-cultural study of sustainable nutrition and its environmental impact in Asia and Europe: A comparison of China and Germany

  • Birgit Anika RUMPOLD ,
  • SUN Lingxiao ,
  • Nina LANGEN ,
  • YU Ruide
Expand
  • aDepartment Education for Sustainable Nutrition and Food Science, Technical University Berlin, Berlin, 14052, Germany
    bState Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi, 830011, China
*E-mail address: rumpold@tu-berlin.de (Birgit Anika RUMPOLD).

Received date: 2024-02-22

  Revised date: 2024-03-14

  Accepted date: 2024-05-29

  Online published: 2024-07-25

Abstract

Global challenges such as climate change, biodiversity loss, and health crises necessitate a shift towards sustainable diets. Incorporating sustainability into food-based dietary guidelines (FBDGs) is essential for this shift, and cultural considerations also play a vital role, as food culture significantly influences dietary habits. Considering that Asia and Europe exhibit distinct food cultures, tailored approaches are necessary. Additionally, countries face diverse nutritional challenges, ranging from malnutrition to diet-related diseases, and regional variation in environmental impact necessitates context-specific strategies. Achieving sustainable nutrition depends on understanding cultural influences and regional dynamics. This paper compares China’s and Germany’s dietary guidelines and dietary patterns and their impact on sustainability. It shows that Chinese and German FBDGs only slightly differ, despite the different eating cultures and habits of each country. Alone the recommended amounts for eggs and fish are considerably higher in China than in Germany. However, in both China and Germany, actual dietary patterns deviate from the dietary guidelines. In China, concomitant with economic growth and urbanization, a dietary shift towards increased consumption of animal products and decreased consumption of vegetables and cereals has been observed in the last decades, which has led to a decline in nutritional deficiencies but an increase in obesity and overweight. Obesity and overweight are also on the rise in Germany. A dietary shift could therefore also be beneficial for public health. While following the respective national guidelines would benefit the environment, alternative diets such as a plant-based diet offer even lower environmental footprint. Revising guidelines to prioritize sustainability in addition to health aspects while considering regional contexts and cultural preferences is recommended to foster sustainable eating habits globally. This approach is pivotal for promoting dietary shift towards sustainability on a global scale.

Cite this article

Birgit Anika RUMPOLD , SUN Lingxiao , Nina LANGEN , YU Ruide . A cross-cultural study of sustainable nutrition and its environmental impact in Asia and Europe: A comparison of China and Germany[J]. Regional Sustainability, 2024 , 5(2) : 100136 . DOI: 10.1016/j.regsus.2024.100136

References

[1] Amilien V., Notaker H., 2018. Health and nutritional perspectives on nordic food traditions—An approach through food culture and history. In: AndersenV., BarE., WirtanenG., (eds.). Nutritional and Health Aspects of Food in Nordic Countries. Salt Lake City: Academic Press, 1-31.
[2] Breidenassel C., Sch?fer A.C., Melanie M., et al., 2022. The Planetary Health Diet in contrast to the food-based dietary guidelines of the German Nutrition Society (DGE). A DGE statement. Nutr. Rev. 69(5), 56-72.
[3] Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 2022. Eight key recommendations from Dietary Guidelines for Chinese Residents (2022). [2023-12-08]. https://en.chinacdc.cn/health_topics/nutrition_health/202206/t20220616_259702.html.
[4] Davis K.F., Gephart J.A., Emery K.A., et al., 2016. Meeting future food demand with current agricultural resources. Glob. Environ. Change. 39, 125-132.
[5] Dawczynski C., Weidauer T., Richert C., et al., 2022. Nutrient intake and nutrition status in vegetarians and vegans in comparison to omnivores-the Nutritional Evaluation (NuEva) study. Front. Nutr. 9, 819106, doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.819106.
[6] European Commission, 2023a. Food-Based Dietary Guidelines-Guidance on Sustainability. [2023-12-08]. https://knowledge4policy.ec.europa.eu/health-promotion-knowledge-gateway/food-based-dietary-guidelines-europe-table-19_en.
[7] European Commission, 2023b. Towards Sustainable Food Consumption-Promoting Healthy, Affordable and Sustainable Food Consumption Choices. Brussels: Publications Office of the European Union, 1-84.
[8] FAO (Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations), 2013.Food Wastage Footprint: Impacts on Natural Resources. Rome: FAO, 6.
[9] FAOSTAT(World Food and Agriculture Organization Statistical Database), 2023. Food and Agriculture Data. [2023-12-29]. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data.
[10] Fischer C.G., Garnett T., 2016. Plates, Pyramids, and Planets: Developments in National Healthy and Sustainable Dietary Guidelines: A State of Play Assessment. Rome: FAO, 2-3, 15.
[11] Gao C., Xu J., Liu Y., et al., 2021. Nutrition Policy and Healthy China 2030 Building. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 75(2), 238-246.
[12] DGE(German Nutrition Society), 2016. 13th DGE-Nutrition Report:Summary. [2023-12-29]. https://www.dge.de/fileadmin/dok/english/DGE-Nutrition-Report-summary-2016.pdf.
[13] DGE, 2017a. 10 Guidelines of the German Nutrition Society (DGE) for a Wholesome Diet. [2023-11-07]. https://www.dge.de/fileadmin/dok/english/10-guidelines/10-guidelines-wholesome-diet-dge.pdf.
[14] DGE, 2017b. Eatin and Drinking Wholesomely according to the 10 Rules of the DGE. [2023-12-16]. https://www.dge.de/gesunde-ernaehrung/dgeernaehrungsempfehlungen/10-regeln/.
[15] DGE, 2023. Food-Related Dietary Recommendations of the DGE (FBDG)-Revision and Further Development. [2023-12-12]. https://www.dge.de/wissenschaft/fbdg/.
[16] Halpern B.S., Frazier M., Verstaen J., et al., 2022. The environmental footprint of global food production. Nat. Sustain. 5(12), 1027-1039.
[17] He P., Baiocchi G., Feng K., et al., 2019. Environmental impacts of dietary quality improvement in China. J. Environ. Manage. 240, 518-526.
[18] Hedegaard L., 2016. Food culture in obesity prevention Europe. European Journal of Public Health. 26(4), 536-537.
[19] Heuer T., Krems C., Moon K., et al., 2015. Food consumption of adults in Germany: results of the German National Nutrition Survey II based on diet history interviews. The British Journal of Nutrition. 113(10), 1603-1614.
[20] Huang L.N., Wang Z.H., Wang H.J., et al., 2021. Nutrition transition and related health challenges over decades in China. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 75(2), 247-252.
[21] IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), 2019. Climate Change and Land: An IPCC Special Report on Climate Change, Desertification, Land Degradation, Sustainable Land Management, Food Security, and Greenhouse Gas Fluxes in Terrestrial Ecosystems. [2024-02-16]. https://www.ipcc.ch/srccl/.
[22] Jiang Q.Q., You Q.Q., Lou Y.L., et al., 2022. Adherence to the Chinese Food Pagoda in the high-risk population of non-communicable diseases aged 35-59 in central China. Front. Nutr. 9, 781963, doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.781963.
[23] Jungvogel A., Michel M., Bechtholdt A., et al., 2016. The food-related nutritional recommendations of the DGE. Nutr. Rev. 8, 474-481.
[24] Kabisch S., Wenschuh S., Buccellato P., et al., 2021. Affordability of different isocaloric healthy diets in Germany-An assessment of food prices for seven distinct food patterns. Nutrients. 13(9), doi: 10.3390/nu13093037.
[25] Klapp A.-L., Feil N., Risius A., 2022. A global analysis of National Dietary Guidelines on plant-based diets and substitutions for animal-based foods. Curr. Dev. Nutr. 6(11), nzac144, doi: 10.1093/cdn/nzac144.
[26] Lei L., Shimokawa S., 2020. Promoting dietary guidelines and environmental sustainability in China. China Econ. Rev. 59, 101087, doi: 10.1016/j.chieco.2017.08.001.
[27] Li H.M., Wu T., Wang X., et al., 2016. The greenhouse gas footprint of China’s food system: An analysis of recent trends and future scenarios. J. Ind. Ecol. 20(4), 803-817.
[28] Li J.J., Song G.B., Ma S.M., et al, 2020. Dietary acculturation generates virtual carbon flow: The overlaid effects of geographically varied dietary patterns and population migration in urban and materials-flowing China. J. Clean Prod. 276, 124283, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124283.
[29] Meier T., Christen O., 2013. Environmental impacts of dietary recommendations and dietary styles: Germany as an example. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47(2), 877-888.
[30] Popkin B.M., 2014. Synthesis and implications: China’s nutrition transition in the context of changes across other low- and middle-income countries. Obesity Reviews: An Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity. 15(Suppl 1), 60-67.
[31] Renner B., Arens-Azevêdo U., Watzl B., et al., 2021. DGE position statement on a more sustainable diet. Nutr. Rev. 68(7), 144-154.
[32] Ritchie H., Rosado P., Roser M., 2022. Environmental Impacts of Food Production. [2024-02-16]. https://ourworldindata.org/environmental-impacts-of-food.
[33] Sch?fer A.C., Schmidt A., Bechthold A., et al., 2021. Integration of various dimensions in food-based dietary guidelines via mathematical approaches: report of a DGE/FENS Workshop in Bonn, Germany, 23-24 September 2019. Br. J. Nutr. 126(6), 942-949.
[34] Song G.B., Li M.J., Fullana-I-Palmer P., et al., 2017. Dietary changes to mitigate climate change and benefit public health in China. Sci. Total Environ. 577, 289-298.
[35] Song G.B., Gao X.B., Fullana-I-Palmer P., et al., 2019. Shift from feeding to sustainably nourishing urban China: A crossing-disciplinary methodology for global environment-food-health nexus. Sci. Total Environ. 647, 716-724.
[36] Springmann M., Godfray H.C.J., Rayner M., et al., 2016. Analysis and valuation of the health and climate change cobenefits of dietary change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 113(15), 4146-4151.
[37] Springmann M., Clark M. A., Mason-D’Croz D., et al., 2018. Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits. Nature. 562(7728), 519-525.
[38] Springmann M., Clark M.A., Rayner M., et al., 2021. The global and regional costs of healthy and sustainable dietary patterns: a modelling study. Lancet Planet. Health. 5(11), e797-e807.
[39] Su B., Zhang C., Martens P., et al., 2022. A comparative study on the dietary ecological footprint in contemporary China. Sci. Total Environ. 8512, 158289, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158289.
[40] Sun Z.X., Scherer L., Tukker A., et al., 2022. Dietary change in high-income nations alone can lead to substantial double climate dividend. Nat. Food. 3(1), 29-37.
[41] Textor C., 2024. Degree of Urbanization in China in Selected Years from 1980 to 2023. [2024-01-30]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/270162/urbanization-in-china/.
[42] Tilman D., Clark M., Williams D.R., et al., 2017. Future threats to biodiversity and pathways to their prevention. Nature. 546(7656), 73-81.
[43] Vermeulen S.J., Campbell B.M., Ingram J.S., 2012. Climate change and food systems. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 37(1), 195-222.
[44] Wang L., Gao B., Hu Y.C., et al., 2020. Environmental effects of sustainability-oriented diet transition in China. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 158, 104802, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104802.
[45] Wang L., Huang W., Zhao C., et al., 2022. Exploring the environment-nutrition-obesity effects associated with food consumption in different groups in China. J. Environ. Manage. 317, 115287, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115287.
[46] WHO(World Health Organization), 1998. Preparation and Use of Food-Based Dietary Guidelines: Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Consultation. [2023-12-27]. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9241208805.
[47] WHO, 2020. Healthy Det. [2023-12-27]. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/healthy-diet.
[48] Willett W., Rockstr?m J., Loken B., et al., 2019. Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet. 393(10170), 447-492.
[49] Wirsam J., Leitzmann C., 2022. Measuring nutrition:our diet in annotated figures and data. Stuttgart: Verlag Eugen Ulmer, 448-449.
[50] Wood A., Queiroz C., Deutsch L., et al., 2023. Reframing the local- global food systems debate through a resilience lens. Nat. Food. 4(1), 22-29.
[51] Wu H.J., MacDonald G.K., Galloway J.N., et al., 2022. A new dietary guideline balancing sustainability and nutrition for China’s rural and urban residents. iScience. 25(10), 105048, doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105048.
[52] Yang Y.X., Wang X.L., Leong P.M., et al., 2018. New Chinese dietary guidelines: healthy eating patterns and food-based dietary recommendations. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 27(4), 908-913.
[53] Yin J.G., Hua J.F., Zhang X.H., et al., 2023. Healthy Eating for All? The challenge of adhering to dietary guidelines for low-income groups in China. Nutrients. 15(12), doi: 10.3390/nu15122704.
[54] Yu Y., Feng K., Hubacek K., et al., 2016. Global implications of China’s future food consumption. J. Ind. Ecol. 20(3), 593-602.
[55] Zhang C.L., Qiang W.L., Niu S.W., et al., 2021. Options of Chinese dietary pattern based on multi-objective optimization. Agricultural and Food Sciences, Environmental Science. 43(6), 1140-1152 (in Chinese).
[56] Zhu C.W., Kobayashi K., Loladze I., et al., 2018. Carbon dioxide (CO2)levels this century will alter the protein, micronutrients, and vitamin content of rice grains with potential health consequences for the poorest rice-dependent countries. Sci. Adv. 4(5), eaaq1012, doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaq1012.
Outlines

/