Regional Sustainability >

2023 , Vol. 4 >Issue 4: 441 - 452

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsus.2023.11.002

Full Length Article

Impact of forest governance and enforcement on deforestation and forest degradation at the district level: A study in West Bengal State, India

  • Aishwarya BASU ,
  • Jyotish Prakash BASU
Expand
  • aUniversity of Burdwan, Burdwan, 713104, India
    bWest Bengal State University, Kolkata, 700126, India
* E-mail address: aishwaryabasu1996@gmail.com (A. BASU).

Received date: 2023-01-26

  Revised date: 2023-08-20

  Accepted date: 2023-11-12

  Online published: 2024-01-09

Fold

Abstract

According to the United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), the world loses 1.0×106 hm2 forest land through deforestation annually. About 1.6×106 people who depend on forests for livelihood are negatively affected by deforestation and forest degradation. The paper attempts to study the impact of forest governance, enforcement and socio-economic factors on deforestation and forest degradation at the local level in West Bengal State, India. The study was based on questionnaire survey data during 2020-2021 collected from three western districts (Purulia, Bankura, and Paschim Medinipur) where deforestation and poverty rates are higher than other districts in West Bengal State. The total number of selected villages was 29, and the total sample households were 693. A stratified random sampling technique was used to collect data, and a questionnaire was followed. Forest governance and enforcement indices were constructed using United Nation Development Programme (UNDP) methodology and a step-wise logistic regression model was used to identify the factors affecting deforestation and forest degradation. The result of this study showed that four factors (illegal logging, weak forest administration, encroachment, and poverty) are identified for the causes of deforestation and forest degradation. It is observed that six indices of forest governance (rule of law, transparency, accountability, participation, inclusiveness and equitability, and efficiency and effectiveness) are relatively high in Purulia District. Moreover, this study shows that Purulia and Bankura districts follow medium forest governance, while Paschim Medinipur District has poor forest governance. The enforcement index is found to be highest in Purulia District (0.717) and lowest for Paschim Medinipur District (0.257). Finally, weak forest governance, poor socio-economic conditions of the households, and weak enforcement lead to the deforestation and forest degradation in the study area. Therefore, governments should strengthen law enforcement and encourage sustainable forest certification schemes to combat illegal logging.

Key words： Deforestation; Forest degradation; Forest governance index; Enforcement index; Illegal logging; Logistic regression model; India

Cite this article

Aishwarya BASU , Jyotish Prakash BASU . Impact of forest governance and enforcement on deforestation and forest degradation at the district level: A study in West Bengal State, India[J]. Regional Sustainability, 2023 , 4(4) : 441 -452 . DOI: 10.1016/j.regsus.2023.11.002

References

[1] Agrawal, A., Ostrom, E., 2001. Collective action, property rights, and decentralization in resource use in India and Nepal. Polit. Soc. 29(4), 485-514.
[2] Ardiyanto, S.Y., Saraswati, R., Soponyono, E., 2022. Law enforcement and community participation in combating illegal logging and deforestation in Indonesia. Environment and Ecology Research. 10(4), 450-460.
[3] Assun??o, J., Gandour, C., Pessoa, P., et al., 2017. Property-level assessment of change in forest clearing patterns: The need for tailoring policy in the Amazon. Land Use Pol. 66, 18-27.
[4] Barbier, E., Richard, D., Daniel, L., 2005. Corruption, trade and resource conversion. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 50(2), 276-299.
[5] Basu, J.P., 2017. Climate Change Adaptation and Forest Dependent Communities. An Analytical Perspective of Different Agro-climatic Regions of West Bengal, India. [2022-01-12]. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-52325-5.
[6] Basu, J.P., 2020. Forest dependence, institutions and enforcement-an empirical study in the drought prone district of Purulia, West Bengal. Indian Journal of Ecology. 47(4), 1068-1073.
[7] Basu, J.P., 2021. Forest participation of local communities: a study of a tribal dominated region in India. J. Social Econ. Dev. 23(1), 180-201.
[8] Basu, J.P., 2023. Governance and Institution in the Indian Forest Sector: An Analytical Study. [2022-01-12]. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34746-7.
[9] Behera, B., Engel, S., 2004. The four levels of Institutional Analysis of Evolution of Joint Forest Management (JFM) in India: A New Institutional Economics (NIE) Approach. [2022-01-12]. https://docslib.org/doc/9969974/the-four-levels-of-institutional-analysis-of-evolution -of-joint-forest-management-jfm-in-india-a-new-institutional-economics-nie-approach.
[10] Bellassen, V., Gitz, V., 2008. Reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation in cameroon-assessing costs and benefits. Ecol. Econ. 68(1-2), 336-344.
[11] Bera, B., Saha, S., Bhattacharjee, S., 2020. Forest cover dynamics (1998 to 2019) and prediction of deforestation probability using binary logistic regression (BLR) model of Silabati watershed. India. Trees, Forests and People. 2, 1-10.
[12] B?sch, M., 2021. Institutional quality, economic development and illegal logging: A quantitative cross-national analysis. Euro. Eur. J. For. Res. 140, 1049-1064.
[13] Bose, P., 2011. Forest tenure reform: Exclusion of tribal women’s rights in Semi-arid Rajasthan, India. Int. For. Rev. 13(2), 220-231.
[14] Bose, P., Arts, B., van Dijk, H., 2012. Forest governmentality: A genealogy of subject-making of forest dependent ‘scheduled tribes’ in India. Land Use Pol. 29(3), 664-673.
[15] Bruce, M., Akakpo, O.B., Ly, M., et al., 2018. What Role do Forests and Governance Play in Countries’ Nationally Determined Contributions to the Paris Climate Agreement? - Case Study from Cameroon. London: Fern and Climate Analytics.
[16] Bujang, M.A., Sa’at, N., Sidik, T.M.I., et al., 2018. Sample size guidelines for logistic regression from observational studies with large population: emphasis on the accuracy between statistics and parameters based on real life clinical data. Malays. J. Med. Sci. 25(4), 122-130.
[17] Carrasco, L.R., Nghiem, T.P., Chen, Z., et al., 2017. Unsustainable development pathways caused by tropical deforestation. Sci. Adv. 3(7), e1602602, doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1602602.
[18] Casson, A., Obidzinski, K., 2002. From new order to regional autonomy: shifting dynamics of “Illegal” logging in Kalimantan, Indonesia. World Dev. 30(12), 2132-2151.
[19] Government of India, 2011. Census of India, Government of India. [2023-01-15]. https://censusindia.gov.in/census.website/.
[20] Chhatre, A., Agrawal, A., 2008. Forest commons and local enforcement. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 105(36), 13286-13291.
[21] Christoph, O., Philipp, L.W., Schmerbeck, J., 2015. Institutions for sustainable forest governance: Robustness, equity and cross-level interactions in Mawlyngbna, Meghalaya in India. Int. J. Commons. 9(2), 670-697.
[22] Delabre, I., Boyd, E., Brockhaus, M., et al., 2020. Unearthing the myths of global sustainable forest governance. Glob. Sustain. 3, 1-10.
[23] Downs, F., Tacconi, L., 2017. A framework to assess the impacts of corruption on forests and prioritize responses. Land Use Pol. 60, 113-122.
[24] Echeverria, C., Coomes, D.A., Hall, M., et al., 2008. Spatially explicit models to analyze forest loss and fragmentation between 1976 and 2020 in southern Chile. Ecol. Model. 212(3-4), 439-449.
[25] FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization), 2011. Global Forest Resource Assessment. Key Findings. Rome: FAO,12.
[26] FSI (India State Forest Report), 2019. India State Forest Report. [2023-01-15]. https://www.fsi.nic.in/forest-report-2019.
[27] Galinato, G.I., Galinato, S.P., 2013. The short-run and long-run effects of corruption control and political stability on forest cover. Ecol. Econ. 89, 153-161.
[28] Gaveau, D.L.A., Linkie, M., Suyadi, et al., 2009. Three decades of deforestation in southwest Sumatra: effects of coffee prices, law enforcement and rural poverty. Biol. Conserv. 142(3), 597-605.
[29] Gayen, A., Saha, S., 2018. Deforestation probable area predicted by logistic regression in Pathro river basin: A tributary of Ajay River. Spat. Inf. Res. 26(1), 1-9.
[30] Ghosh, M., Sinha, B., 2016. Impact of forest policies on timber production in India: A review. Natural Resources Forum. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd., 62-76.
[31] Goncalves, M.P., Panjer, M., Greenberg., T.S., et al., 2012. Justice for forests: Improving criminal justice efforts to combat illegal logging. World Bank Studies. Washington D.C.: the World Bank, 1-60.
[32] Hanneke, V., Vincent, G.V., Maria, J.S., 2022. Forest governance and development effects on tropical charcoal production and deforestation. Environ. Res. Lett. 17(2), 24-40.
[33] IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), 2007. Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1-863.
[34] Joshi, A.K., Pant, P., Kumar, P., et al., 2011. National forest policy in India: Critique of targets and implementation. Small-Scale For. 10(1), 83-96.
[35] Joshi, P., Beck, K., 2017. Environmental Kuznets curve for deforestation: Evidence using GMM estimation for OECD and non-OECD regions. iForest. 10(1), 196-203.
[36] Kalamandeen, M., Gloor, E., Mitchard, E., et al., 2018. Pervasive rise of small-scale deforestation in Amazonia. Sci. Rep. 8(1), 1600, doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-19358-2.
[37] Karanth, K.K., de Fries, R., 2010. Conservation and management in human-dominated landscapes: Case studies from India. Biol. Conserv. 143(12), 2865-2869.
[38] Khan, A.M., Hussain, A., Siddique, S., et al., 2017. Effects of deforestation on socio-economy and associated insect pests in district, Swat, Pakistan. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies. 5(1), 954-960.
[39] Luttrell, C., Obidzinski, K., Brockhaus, M., et al., 2011. Lessons for REDD+ from Measures to Control Illegal Logging in Indonesia. Bogor: the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, 1-90.
[40] Malik, Z.A., Pandey, R., Bhat, A.B., 2016. Anthropogenic disturbances and their impact on vegetation in Western Himalaya, India. J. Mt. Sci. 13(1), 69-82.
[41] Minlah, M.K., Zhang, X.B., Ganyoh, P.N., et al., 2021. Does the environmental Kuznets curve for deforestation exist for Ghana? Evidence from the bootstrap rolling window Granger causality test approach. Forestry Economics Review. 3(1), 38-52.
[42] MoEF (Ministry of Environment & Forest), 1988. Annual Report, Ministry of Environment and Forest, Government of India. [2023-01-15]. https://moef.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/AR-87-88.pdf.
[43] MoEF, 2006. Report of the National Forest Commission. New Delhi, India: Ministry of Environment & Forests, Government of India, 1-420.
[44] Mohanty, B., Sahu, G., 2012. An empirical study on elements of forest governance: A study of JFM implementation models in odisha. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 37, 314-323.
[45] Nagendra, H., Gokhale, Y., 2008. Management regimes, property rights, and forest biodiversity in Nepal and India. Environ. Manage. 41(5), 719-733.
[46] Ostermann, S.L., 2016. Rule of law against the odds: overcoming poverty and the high cost of compliance in the developing world. Law Policy. 38(2), 101-123.
[47] Ostrom, E., 1990. Governing the commons:The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press. 86(1), 248-249.
[48] Palmer, C.E., 2001. The Extent and Causes of Illegal Logging: An Analysis of a Major Cause of Tropical Deforestation in Indonesia. London: Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment (CSERGE), 1-33.
[49] Pandit, K., Bevilacqua, E., Mountrakis, G., et al., 2016. Spatial analysis of forest crimes in Mark Twain National Forest, Missouri. Journal of Geospatial Application in Natural Resources. 1(1), 39-53
[50] Pant, K.R., 2021. Analysis of forest governance in far-western Terairegion of Nepal. Contemporary Research: An Interdisciplinary Academic Journal. 5(1), 35-50.
[51] Pellegrini, L., Gerlagh, R., 2006. Corruption, democracy, and environmental policy: An empirical contribution to the debate. The Journal of Environment & Development. 15(3), 332-54.
[52] Probst, B., BenYishay, A., Kontoleon, A., et al., 2020. Impacts of a large-scale titling initiative on deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Nat. Sustain. 3, 1019-1026.
[53] Reboredo, F., 2013. Socio-economic, environmental, and governance impacts of illegal logging. Environment Systems and Decisions. 33, 295-304.
[54] RECOFTC (The Center for People and Forests). 2018. Assessing Forest Governance in Myanmar. Identifying Key Challenges and Interventions to Strengthen Governance. Bangkok: RECOFTC, 1-8.
[55] Richard, J.C., 2007. Deforestation and the environmental Kuznets curve: An institutional perspective. Ecol. Econ. 61(2-3), 429-437.
[56] Rivera, S., Martinez, A.P., Ramsey, R.D., et al., 2012. Spatial modeling of tropical deforestation using socioeconomic and biophysical data. Small-Scale For. 12, 321-334.
[57] Robinson, E.J.Z., Kumar, A.M., Albers, H.J., 2010. Protecting developing countries’ forests: Enforcement in theory and practice. Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research. 2(1), 25-38.
[58] Rossiter, D.G, Loza, A., 2008. Technical Note: Analyzing Land Cover Change with R. Enschede: International Institute for Geo-information Science & Earth Observation (ITC), 1-43.
[59] Roy, B., 2006. Women’s participation in the Forest Governance: A case study of Buxa Tiger Reserve Forests. Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies. 2(10), 48-59.
[60] Schroeder, H., 2010. Agency in international climate negotiations: the case of indigenous peoples and avoided deforestation. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics. 10(4), 317-332.
[61] Shah, A., Guru, B., 2003. Poverty in Remote Rural Areas in India: A Review of Evidence and Issues. Ahmedabad: Gujarat Institute of Development Research, 13-69.
[62] Shrestha, S., Shrestha, U.B., Bawa, K., 2018. Socio-economic factors and management regimes as drivers of tree cover change in Nepal. PeerJ. 6, e4855, doi: 10.7717/peerj.4855.
[63] Sittumorang, A.W., Nababan, A., Tarigan, A.N., et al., 2015. The 2014 Indonesis Forest Governance Index, UNDP Indonesia. [2023-01-15]. https://www.undp.org/indonesia/publications/executive-summary-2014-indonesia-forest-governance-index.
[64] Sloan, S., Sayer, J.A., 2015. Forest resources assessment of 2015 shows positive global trends but forest loss and degradation persist in poor tropical countries. For. Ecol. Manage. 352, 134-145.
[65] Smith, J., Colan, V., Sabogal, C., et al., 2006. Why policy reforms fail to improve logging practices: The role of governance and norms in Peru. For. Forest Policy Econ. 8(4), 458-469.
[66] Tacconi, L., 2007. The problem of illegal logging. In: Tacconi, L., (ed.). Illegal Logging: Law Enforcement, Livelihoods and the Timber Trade. London: Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), 301.
[67] Tacconi, L., Cerutti, P.O., Leipold, S., et al., Defining illegal forest activities and illegal logging. In: Kleinschmit, D., Mansourian, S., Wildburger, C., (eds.). Illegal Logging and Related Timber Trade-Dimensions, Drivers, Impacts and Responses. A Global Scientific Rapid Assessment Report. Vienna: International Union of Forest Research Organizations (IUFRO), 23-36.
[68] Tacconi, L., Rodrigues, R.J., Maryudi, A., 2019. Law enforcement and deforestation: lessons for Indonesia from Brazil. Forest Policy Econ. 108(101943), 1-10.
[69] Tacconi, L., Williams, D.A., 2020. Corruption and anti-corruption in environmental and resource management. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 45, 305-329.
[70] TERI (The Energy and Resource Institute), 2004. Socio-Economic and Institutional Assessment for Forest Sector Analysis in Jharkhand. New Delhi: Tropical Forestry Management Programmeme, 186.
[71] Ullah, S., Wu, Y., Khan, A.I., 2023. Evaluating the socio-economic factors on deforestation in Northern Pakistan: A study on existing economic incentive tools for reducing deforestation. Sustainability. 15(7), 1-22.
[72] Umemiya, C., Rametsteiner, E., Kraxner, F., 2010. Quantifying the impacts of the quality of governance on deforestation. Environ. Sci. Policy. 13(8), 695-701.
[73] United Nations, 2006. Good Governance Practices for the Protection of Human Rights. Geneva: Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, 1-94.
[74] Waldhoff, P., Vidal, E., 2015. Community loggers attempting to legalize traditional timber harvesting in the Brazilian Amazon: An endless path. Forest Policy Econ. 50, 311-318.
[75] World Bank, 2018. World Development Report-Governance and the Law. [2023-01-15]. www.worldbank.org/en/topic/governance/brief/anti-corruption.
[76] Yanai, A.M, Gra?a, P.M.L.A., Ziccardi, L.G., et al., 2022. Brazil’s Amazonian deforestation: the role of landholdings in undesignated public lands. Reg. Envir. Chang. 22(1), 1-14.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉

Authors
  • Submit Online
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submission Template
  • Author Declaration Template
  • Ethical Policy
    • Reviewers
  • Reviewers Login
  • Tutorial for Reviewers
    • Contact
  • Tel: 86-991-7827334
    E-mail: regsus@ms.xjb.ac.cn
    Address: No. 818 South Beijing Road,
                   Urumqi 830011, Xinjiang, China
    • REGSUS Wechat
    • Copyright © Editorial Office of Regional Sustainability. All Rights Reserved.
    • 新ICP备06001700号-10　 新公网安备 65010402001202号