Regional Sustainability ›› 2023, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (4): 453-464.doi: 10.1016/j.regsus.2023.11.007cstr: 32279.14.j.regsus.2023.11.007
• Full Length Article • Previous Articles
Tewodros ABUHAYa,b,*(), Endalkachew TESHOMEc, Gashaw MULUb
Received:
2023-05-03
Revised:
2023-10-12
Accepted:
2023-11-29
Published:
2023-12-30
Online:
2024-01-09
Contact:
* E-mail address: abtedi@gmail.com (T. ABUHAY).Tewodros ABUHAY, Endalkachew TESHOME, Gashaw MULU. A tale of duality: Community perceptions towards the ecotourism impacts on Simien Mountains National Park, Ethiopia[J]. Regional Sustainability, 2023, 4(4): 453-464.
Table 1
Descriptive statistics for positive impacts of ecotourism perceived by the community residents in Semien Mountain National Park (SMNP)."
Dimension | Item | Mean | Standard deviation |
---|---|---|---|
Economic impact | Ecotourism brings economic benefits for the residents. | 3.95 | 0.75 |
Ecotourism contributes to improving incomes and living standards. | 4.00 | 0.72 | |
Ecotourism creates a local business environment. | 4.05 | 0.72 | |
Ecotourism creates employment opportunities for local residents. | 4.28 | 0.69 | |
Ecotourism encourages investments and infrastructure improvement. | 4.21 | 0.75 | |
Ecotourism promotes the development of local products by creating new market. | 3.86 | 0.89 | |
Ecotourism generates substantial tax revenues for government. | 3.65 | 1.00 | |
Average score of economic impacts | 4.00 | 0.78 | |
Socio-cultural impact | Ecotourism provides cultural exchange and education opportunities to the host community. | 4.33 | 0.51 |
Ecotourism facilitates the development of community facilities and services. | 4.14 | 0.54 | |
Ecotourism preserves cultural values and customs of the community. | 3.91 | 0.59 | |
Ecotourism creates new learning opportunities for residents. | 4.05 | 0.57 | |
Ecotourism increases pride in cultural identity. | 4.04 | 0.55 | |
Average score of socio-cultural impacts | 4.09 | 0.55 | |
Environmental impact | Ecotourism would help to protect the natural environment in community. | 4.02 | 0.72 |
Ecotourism would create decent and conducive living environment for the host community. | 3.96 | 0.69 | |
Ecotourism would contribute for the productions of fauna and flora. | 4.08 | 0.61 | |
Ecotourism helps nature to be valued and protected. | 4.11 | 0.71 | |
Ecotourism creates awareness about the importance and value of natural and cultural sites. | 3.97 | 0.81 | |
Average score of environmental impacts | 4.03 | 0.70 |
Table 2
Summary of demographic differences in communities’ perceptions of economic impacts of ecotourism."
Variable | Mean | Standard deviation | F-value | P-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 27.98 | 3.93 | 4.60 | 0.000 |
Female | 23.52 | 1.67 | |||
Age | 18-29 years old | 29.11 | 4.28 | 1.34 | 0.039 |
30-45 years old | 28.12 | 4.25 | |||
46-60 years old | 27.73 | 4.06 | |||
Above 60 years old | 27.12 | 2.47 | |||
Level of education | Illiterate | 29.00 | 2.74 | 5.33 | 0.001 |
Read and write | 29.33 | 3.77 | |||
Primary school | 30.12 | 0.29 | |||
Secondary school | 31.40 | 6.88 | |||
College diploma and above | 31.50 | 5.12 | |||
Location | Debark Woreda | 29.05 | 3.42 | 7.71 | 0.001 |
Janamora Woreda | 27.50 | 2.86 | |||
Beyeda Woreda | 27.05 | 5.22 |
Table 3
Determinants of communities’ perceptions of economic impacts of ecotourism."
Variable | Regression coefficient (B) | Standard error | Wald chi-square | Odds ratio | P-value | Confidence interval | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5% | 97.5% | ||||||||
Gender | Male | 0.342 | 0.198 | 2.983 | 1.409 | 0.044 | 0.312 | 7.410 | |
Female | 0.122 | 0.112 | 1.186 | 1.118 | 0.121 | 0.012 | 3.143 | ||
Age | 18-29 years old | 1.175 | 0.431 | 7.382 | 3.240 | 0.002 | 1.158 | 12.232 | |
30-45 years old | 0.831 | 0.346 | 3.856 | 2.298 | 0.049 | 1.113 | 6.730 | ||
46-60 years old | 0.499 | 0.363 | 1.702 | 1.645 | 0.071 | 0.693 | 3.890 | ||
Above 60 years old | 0.092 | 0.255 | 0.227 | 1.096 | 0.635 | 0.415 | 1.387 | ||
Level of education | Illiterate | 0.103 | 0.340 | 0.092 | 1.196 | 0.762 | 0.461 | 2.461 | |
Read and write | 0.259 | 0.396 | 0.439 | 1.296 | 0.049 | 0.576 | 3.972 | ||
Primary school | 0.558 | 0.452 | 1.478 | 1.748 | 0.031 | 0.724 | 4.823 | ||
Secondary school | 0.834 | 0.511 | 2.679 | 2.303 | 0.021 | 0.878 | 12.101 | ||
College diploma and above | 1.154 | 0.981 | 1.383 | 3.170 | 0.019 | 0.781 | 5.122 | ||
Location | Debark Woreda | 1.128 | 0.362 | 9.709 | 3.090 | 0.002 | 1.288 | 12.214 | |
Janamora Woreda | 0.847 | 0.291 | 8.471 | 2.332 | 0.060 | 1.352 | 7.938 | ||
Beyeda Woreda | 0.413 | 0.278 | 2.207 | 1.510 | 0.101 | 0.166 | 2.429 | ||
Benefit from ecotourism | 0.812 | 0.220 | 13.590 | 2.253 | 0.001 | 0.790 | 11.540 | ||
Degree of community attachment | 0.496 | 0.207 | 5.810 | 1.641 | 0.061 | 0.420 | 10.110 |
Table 4
Summary of demographic differences in communities’ perceptions of socio-cultural impacts of ecotourism."
Variable | Mean | Standard deviation | F-value | P-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 20.61 | 1.85 | 5.23 | 0.010 |
Female | 18.43 | 1.99 | |||
Age | 18-29 years old | 20.34 | 2.01 | 5.44 | 0.000 |
30-45 years old | 20.43 | 2.13 | |||
46-60 years old | 20.80 | 1.65 | |||
Above 60 years old | 20.50 | 1.20 | |||
Level of education | Illiterate | 20.09 | 1.89 | 4.88 | 0.010 |
Read and write | 20.63 | 2.00 | |||
Primary school | 20.84 | 1.62 | |||
Secondary school | 20.90 | 1.48 | |||
College diploma and above | 21.85 | 2.34 | |||
Location | Debark Woreda | 20.21 | 1.40 | 3.90 | 0.098 |
Janamora Woreda | 20.12 | 2.10 | |||
Beyeda Woreda | 20.12 | 2.40 |
Table 5
Summary of statistics scores on the environmental impacts of ecotourism."
Variable | Mean | Standard deviation | F-value | P-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 22.12 | 1.54 | 4.16 | 0.089 |
Female | 22.43 | 1.21 | |||
Age | 18-29 years old | 21.34 | 1.01 | 4.12 | 0.451 |
30-45 years old | 22.12 | 2.11 | |||
46-60 years old | 23.43 | 1.33 | |||
Above 60 years old | 23.56 | 1.33 | |||
Level of Education | Illiterate | 21.5 | 1.33 | 4.31 | 0.040 |
Read and write | 22.34 | 2.32 | |||
Primary school | 23.21 | 1.34 | |||
Secondary school | 23.89 | 1.65 | |||
College diploma and above | 24.56 | 1.41 | |||
Location | Debark Woreda | 22.32 | 3.29 | 5.18 | 0.120 |
Janamora Woreda | 22.11 | 4.10 | |||
Beyeda Woreda | 22.12 | 1.30 |
Table 6
Descriptive statistics for negative impacts of ecotourism perceived by the community residents in SMNP."
Dimension | Item | Mean | Standard deviation |
---|---|---|---|
Economic impact | Ecotourism increases the prices of products and services. | 3.94 | 0.55 |
Ecotourism brings economic benefits only for small number of residents. | 4.72 | 0.47 | |
Ecotourism benefits mainly businesses and people outside the locality. | 3.87 | 0.76 | |
Average score of economic impacts | 4.10 | 0.59 | |
Socio-cultural impact | Ecotourism causes for violation and breaking of local norms, customs, and cultures. | 3.97 | 0.72 |
Ecotourism would cause displacement of residents. | 4.02 | 0.69 | |
Ecotourism would increase the incidents of crime in an area. | 4.24 | 0.70 | |
Average score of socio-cultural impacts | 4.07 | 0.69 | |
Environmental impact | Ecotourism puts pressure on endangered species. | 3.85 | 0.90 |
Ecotourism would cause overuse and degradation of natural resources. | 4.33 | 0.99 | |
Average score of environmental impacts | 4.09 | 0.94 |
Table 7
Determinants of participation in ecotourism activities for community residents in SMNP."
Independent variable | B | Odds ratio | P-value |
---|---|---|---|
Gender | 1.850 | 6.359 | 0.023 |
Age | -0.430 | 0.650 | 0.412 |
Level of education | 0.238 | 1.268 | 0.032 |
Location | 0.420 | 1.521 | 0.041 |
Marital status | -0.079 | 1.082 | 0.321 |
Landholding size | -0.432 | 1.540 | 0.161 |
Occupation (tourism experienced) | 0.920 | 2.509 | 0.019 |
Family size | -0.313 | 1.367 | 0.845 |
Number of observations | 397 | ||
Nagelkerke’s R2 | 0.421 | ||
Level of significance | 5% |
[1] |
Abdurahman, A.Z.A., Ali, J.K., Khedif, L.Y.B., et al., 2016. Ecotourism product attributes and tourist attractions: UiTM undergraduate studies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 224, 360-367.
doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.388 |
[2] | Abuhay, T., Abiew, D., Leulseged, T., 2019. Challenges and opportunities of the tourism industry in Amhara Regional State: The World Heritage sites in focus. African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure. 8(5), 8-10. |
[3] | Admasu, S., 2020. Ecotourism as a tool to substantially funding conservation endeavors in Ethiopia. Journal of Tourism and Hospitality. 9(3), 432, doi: 10.35248/2167-0269.20.9.432. |
[4] |
Agyeman, Y.B., Yeboah, A.O., Ashie, E., 2019. Protected areas and poverty reduction: the role of ecotourism livelihood in local communities in Ghana. Community Dev. 50(1), 73-91.
doi: 10.1080/15575330.2019.1572635 |
[5] |
Alemayehu, K., Dessie, T., Gizaw, S., et al., 2011. Population dynamics of Walia ibex (Capra walie) at Simien Mountains National Park, Ethiopia. Afr. J. Ecol. 49(3), 292-300.
doi: 10.1111/aje.2011.49.issue-3 |
[6] | Angessa, A.T., Lemma, B., Yeshitela, K., et al., 2022. Community perceptions towards the impacts of ecotourism development in the central highlands of Ethiopia: the case of Lake Wanchi and its adjacent landscapes. Heliyon. 8(2), e08924, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08924. |
[7] | Ante, Š., Branko, C., Silvija, Š., et al., 2019. Land suitability zoning for ecotourism planning and development of Dikgatlhong Dam, Botswana. Geogr. Pannonica. 23(2), 76-86. |
[8] | Arowosafe, F.C., Kudder, C.-J.W., Rose Emma, E.-M.M., 2019. Perceptions on benefits of ecotourism development by residents of fringe communities to two national parks in West Africa. American Journal of Tourism Management. 8(1), 8-18. |
[9] |
Aseres, S.A., Sira, R.K., 2021. Ecotourism development in Ethiopia: costs and benefits for protected area conservation. J. Ecotourism. 20(3), 224-249.
doi: 10.1080/14724049.2020.1857390 |
[10] | Asfaw, Y., Melese, G., Abunie, Y., et al., 2021. Tourism enterprises job opportunities: the roles and challenges for sustainable tourism development in Amhara National Regional State, Ethiopia. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences. 10(3), 299-308. |
[11] | Brett, M.R., 2018. Tourism in the Kruger National Park: past development, present determinants and future constraints. African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure. 7(2), 1-28. |
[12] |
Cabral, C., Dhar, R.L., 2020. Ecotourism research in India: from an integrative literature review to a future research framework. J. Ecotourism. 19(1), 23-49.
doi: 10.1080/14724049.2019.1625359 |
[13] |
Chaigneau, T., Coulthard, S., Brown, K., et al., 2019. Incorporating basic needs to reconcile poverty and ecosystem services. Conserv. Biol. 33(3), 655-664.
doi: 10.1111/cobi.13209 pmid: 30125996 |
[14] | Chamboko-Mpotaringa, M., PTichaawa, T.M., 2021. Tourism digital marketing tools and views on future trends: a systematic review of literature. African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure. 10(2), 712-726. |
[15] | Creswell, J.W., 2014. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th edition). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Ltd., 228. |
[16] | Demssie, M.A., 2015. Tourism as sustainable local development option: a case study in Simen Mountains National Park, Ethiopia. International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies. 10(1), 278-284. |
[17] | Dey, T., Ahmed, S., Bachar, B.K., et al., 2020. Prospects of community based eco-tourism in Sundarbans: a case study at Munshiganj, Satkhira, Bangladesh. International Journal of Forestry, Ecology and Environment. 2(1), 60-68. |
[18] | Gashaw, T., 2015. Threats of Bale Mountains National Park and solutions, Ethiopia. Journal of Physical Science and Environmental Studies. 1(2), 10-16. |
[19] |
Gebremicael, T.G., Mohamed, Y.A., van der Zaag, P., et al., 2018. Quantifying longitudinal land use change from land degradation to rehabilitation in the headwaters of Tekeze-Atbara Basin, Ethiopia. Sci. Total Environ. 622-623, 1581-1589.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.034 |
[20] | Gulte, E., Tadele, H., Haileslassie, A., et al., 2022. Perception of Local Communities on the Environmental and Socio-economic Benefits and Management Systems of the Bale Mountains National Park, Ethiopia. [2023-02-18]. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1769264/v1. |
[21] |
Holladay, P.J., Ormsby, A.A., 2011. A comparative study of local perceptions of ecotourism and conservation at Five Blues Lake National Park, Belize. J. Ecotourism. 10(2), 118-134.
doi: 10.1080/14724049.2010.529910 |
[22] |
Holland, K.K., Larson, L.R., Powell, R.B., et al., 2022. Impacts of tourism on support for conservation, local livelihoods, and community resilience around Maasai Mara National Reserve, Kenya. J. Sustain. Tour. 30(11), 2526-2548.
doi: 10.1080/09669582.2021.1932927 |
[23] |
Huang, Y.J., Li, C.L., Chen, K.H., 2021. Ecotourism perceptions, impacts, and carrying capacity: the case of Walami trail in Yushan National Park. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance. 12(5), 121-125.
doi: 10.18178/IJTEF |
[24] | Hurni, H., Ludi, E., 2000. Reconciling Conservation with Sustainable Development. A Participatory Study inside and around the Simen Mountains National Park, Ethiopia. Berne: Centre for Development and Environment (CDE), University of Berne, 21. |
[25] | Karayilan, E., Cetin, G., 2016. Tourism destination: design of experiences. In: Sotiriadis, M., Gursoy, D., (eds.). The Handbook of Managing and Marketing Tourism Experiences. Leeds: Emerald Publishing Limited, 65-83. |
[26] |
Kimengsi, J.N., 2014. Threats to ecotourism development and forest conservation in the Lake Barombi Mbo Area (LBMA) of Cameroon. Journal of International Wildlife Law and Policy. 17(4), 213-230.
doi: 10.1080/13880292.2014.957033 |
[27] |
Kiss, A., 2004. Is community-based ecotourism a good use of biodiversity conservation funds? Trends Ecol. Evol. 19(5), 232-237.
pmid: 16701261 |
[28] | Koki, J.N., 2017. Contribution of ecotourism towards sustainable livelihood of the communities living on Wasini Island, Kwale County, Kenya. Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Management. 5(3), 106-125. |
[29] | Liu, W., Vogt, C.A., Luo, J.Y., et al., 2012. Drivers and socioeconomic impacts of tourism participation in protected areas. PLoS One. 7(4), e35420, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035420. |
[30] | Peach, M., 2017. Evaluating the role of protected areas in mitigating avian responses to climate and land use change. PhD Dissertation. New York: State University of New York. |
[31] |
Ruhanen, L., 2019. The prominence of eco in ecotourism experiences: An analysis of post-purchase online reviews. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 39, 110-116.
doi: 10.1016/j.jhtm.2019.03.006 |
[32] | Saikia, M., 2015. Tourism and its socio-economic impacts on local communities: a case study of Kaziranga and Manas National Park of Assam, India. International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research. 3(4), 353-356. |
[33] | Sarmah, H.K., Hazarika, B.B., 2012. Importance of the size of sample and its determination in the context of data related to the schools of greater Guwahati. Bulletin of the Gauhati University Mathematics Association. 12, 55-76. |
[34] | Teshome, E., Demissie, E., 2018. Tourist services quality in the Simien Mountains National Park, World Heritage Site, Ethiopia. African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure. 7(2), 1-14. |
[35] |
Teshome, E., Shita, F., Abebe, F., 2021. Current community based ecotourism practices in Menz Guassa community conservation area, Ethiopia. GeoJournal. 86, 2135-2147.
doi: 10.1007/s10708-020-10179-3 |
[36] | Thompson, B.S., Gillen, J., Friess, D.A., 2018. Challenging the principles of ecotourism: insights from entrepreneurs on environmental and economic sustainability in Langkawi, Malaysia. J. Sustain. Tour. 26(2), 257-276. |
[37] |
Wang, P.W., Zhong, L.S., 2018. Tourists’ willingness to pay for protected area ecotourism resources and influencing factors at the Hulun Lake protected area. Journal of Resources and Ecology. 9(2), 174-180.
doi: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2018.02.007 |
[38] | Ward, K., Gott, M., Hoare, K., 2016. Analysis in Grounded Theory—How Is It Done? Examples from a Study That Explored Living with Treatment for Sleep Apnea. London: SAGE Publications Ltd., 121. |
[39] | Wondie, M., Teketay, D., Melesse, A.M., et al., 2012. Relationship between topographic variables and land cover in the Simen Mountains National Park, a World Heritage Site in Northern Ethiopia. International Journal of Remote Sensing Applications. 2(2), 36-43. |
[40] | Wondirad, A., Bogale, D., Li, Y., 2021. Practices and challenges of developing handicrafts as a core tourism product in Chencha and Konso, southern Ethiopia. Int. J. Cult, Policy. doi: 10.1080/10286632.2021.1938560. |
[41] | Xu, L.X., Xu, W.Y., Jiang, C., et al., 2022. Evaluating communities’ willingness to participate in ecosystem conservation in Southeast Tibetan Nature Reserves, China. Land. 11(2), 207, doi: 10.3390/land11020207. |
[42] |
Zhang, H., Lei, S.L., 2012. A structural model of residents’ intention to participate in ecotourism: The case of a wetland community. Tourism Manage. 33(4), 916-925.
doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2011.09.012 |
[43] | Zhang, J.Z., Yin, N., Li, Y., et al., 2020. Socioeconomic impacts of a protected area in China: An assessment from rural communities of Qianjiangyuan National Park Pilot. Land Use Pol. 99, 104849, doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104849. |
[1] | Piyall CHATTERJEE, Soumyendra Kishore DATTA. Preserving environmental quality of ecotourism sites through community participation in Purulia District of West Bengal, India [J]. Regional Sustainability, 2024, 5(3): 100163-. |
[2] | Uswathul HASANA, Sampada Kumar SWAIN, Babu GEORGE. A bibliometric analysis of ecotourism: A safeguard strategy in protected areas [J]. Regional Sustainability, 2022, 3(1): 27-40. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||